From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Florian Westphal Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the netfilter-next tree Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 19:51:23 +0200 Message-ID: <20180515175123.ncxzaaexp3ehcpwx@breakpoint.cc> References: <20180507105519.1d34f19e@canb.auug.org.au> <20180508102101.768d5c52@canb.auug.org.au> <20180508071756.grie5wln2lpo52un@breakpoint.cc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Florian Westphal , Stephen Rothwell , David Miller , Pablo Neira Ayuso , NetFilter , Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Fernando Fernandez Mancera List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 9:17 AM, Florian Westphal wrote: > > Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >> On Mon, 7 May 2018 10:55:19 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >> > > >> > After merging the netfilter-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > >> > allmodconfig) produced this warning: > >> > > >> > ./usr/include/linux/netfilter/nf_osf.h:25: found __[us]{8,16,32,64} type without #include > >> > >> > Introduced by commit > >> > > >> > bfb15f2a95cb ("netfilter: extract Passive OS fingerprint infrastructure from xt_osf") > > > > I'll send a fix for this, thanks for reporting. > > +config NF_OSF > + tristate 'Passive OS fingerprint infrastructure' > > "There is no help available for this option." > > Is this meant to be a user-visible symbol? No, its not. I can send a patch in case you're too busy, let me know.