linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the pm tree
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 11:02:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181210090257.GY10650@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9045374.omvoRxFOEf@aspire.rjw.lan>

On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 09:58:53AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, December 10, 2018 6:14:54 AM CET Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Today's linux-next merge of the driver-core tree got a conflict in:
> > 
> >   drivers/base/platform.c
> > u
> > between commit:
> > 
> >   2d51ac9086fd ("driver core: platform: Remove duplicated device_remove_properties() call")
> > 
> > from the pm tree and commit:
> > 
> >   99fef587ff98 ("driver core: platform: Respect return code of platform_device_register_full()")
> > 
> > from the driver-core tree.
> > 
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > complex conflicts.
> 
> The fix looks good to me, thank you!

Confirm, the result looks as it supposed to be.
Thanks!

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

  reply	other threads:[~2018-12-10  9:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-10  5:14 linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the pm tree Stephen Rothwell
2018-12-10  8:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-12-10  9:02   ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-07-01  8:32 Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-03 13:04 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-11-14  2:09 Stephen Rothwell
2016-11-14 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-11-11  4:41 Stephen Rothwell
2014-12-02 18:10 ` Greg KH
2014-11-10  4:18 Stephen Rothwell
2014-11-10  4:40 ` Greg KH
2013-08-30  5:26 Stephen Rothwell
2013-08-30  6:02 ` Greg KH
2013-06-27  7:14 Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-27 15:36 ` Greg KH
2013-06-07  4:49 Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-07 17:38 ` Greg KH
2013-05-22  3:47 Stephen Rothwell
2013-05-22  4:02 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-05-22 11:26   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-11  4:42 Stephen Rothwell
2013-02-11 12:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181210090257.GY10650@smile.fi.intel.com \
    --to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).