Hi Anshuman,

On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 22:35:38 +0530 Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> wrote:
>
> On 12/03/2018 12:30 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Andrew,
> > 
> > After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc_le perf)
> > failed like this:
> > 
> > bench/numa.c:37:10: fatal error: linux/numa.h: No such file or directory
> >  #include <linux/numa.h>
> >           ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > 
> > Caused by patches
> > 
> >   "mm: replace all open encodings for NUMA_NO_NODE"
> >   "mm-replace-all-open-encodings-for-numa_no_node-fix"
> > 
> > For linux/numa.h to be generally availble to the tools builds, it must
> > be copied into tools/include/linux ...
> > 
> > I have done that copy for today:
> > 
> > From 6dabc11d5513510d0ec0a6b0a4aa8b9051b71516 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> > Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 17:57:27 +1100
> > Subject: [PATCH] linux/numa.h is now needed for the perf build
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>  
> 
> Hello Stephen,
> 
> I will respin the original patch (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10698089/)
> once more to accommodate new feedbacks from Lubomir Rintel. This patch fixes the
> build problem related to tools/perf. As Lubomir suggested, it might be better to
> split the tools/perf changes ("tools: Replace open encodings for NUMA_NO_NODE")
> from the original patch and then fold this fix onto it with both signed-off-by.
> Does it sound good. Are you okay with it ?

Sounds fine to me.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell