linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	PowerPC <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the powerpc tree
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 17:16:09 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190225171609.07e1fc5c@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 929 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in:

  arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c

between commits:

  c8e409a33cf8 ("powerpc/irq: use memblock functions returning virtual address")
  d608898abc74 ("powerpc: clean stack pointers naming")

from the powerpc tree and commit:

  82af77ee7503 ("powerpc: prefer memblock APIs returning virtual address")

from the akpm-current tree.

Commits 82af77ee7503 and c8e409a33cf8 overlap.

I fixed it up (I just used the powerpc tree version of this file) and
can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next
is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may
also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.



-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2019-02-25  6:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-25  6:16 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-06-18  9:44 linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the powerpc tree Stephen Rothwell
2021-06-19  2:54 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-05-05  1:39 Stephen Rothwell
2021-05-05  4:57 ` Michael Ellerman
2021-05-05  5:46   ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-05-05 23:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-04-15  9:44 Stephen Rothwell
2021-04-15  9:58 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-04-15 10:07   ` Christophe Leroy
2021-04-15 10:08     ` Christophe Leroy
2021-04-15 10:15       ` Christophe Leroy
2020-12-08  9:40 Stephen Rothwell
2020-12-17  0:48 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-09-17  8:57 Stephen Rothwell
2020-06-03  8:50 Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-08 11:43 Stephen Rothwell
2019-04-23  8:57 Stephen Rothwell
2019-02-25  6:42 Stephen Rothwell
2019-02-25  6:44 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-12-06  6:44 Stephen Rothwell
2018-12-07  1:40 ` Joel Fernandes
2016-05-02  7:20 Stephen Rothwell
2016-05-02 11:17 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-03-04  7:49 Stephen Rothwell
2015-12-18  5:33 Stephen Rothwell
2016-01-07  9:15 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-01-07 17:15   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-01-07 20:03     ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-12-15  5:53 Stephen Rothwell
2015-12-15  6:44 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-12-15  9:37 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190225171609.07e1fc5c@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@c-s.fr \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).