From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Corey Minyard Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the ipmi tree Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 16:12:12 -0500 Message-ID: <20190403211212.GE2479@minyard.net> References: <20190403143323.156ac503@canb.auug.org.au> <20190403202728.GD2479@minyard.net> Reply-To: cminyard@mvista.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190403202728.GD2479@minyard.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" , Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Konstantin Khlebnikov List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 03:27:29PM -0500, Corey Minyard wrote: > On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 02:33:23PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi Corey, > > > > After merging the ipmi tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > Paul, any opinions on this? Is just running this in a workqueue > the best idea? Well, I just that patch using a work item and pushed it up. Seems to work ok. That was already done for other things in the driver. > > -corey > > > > > drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c: In function 'free_user': > > drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c:1268:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'cleanup_srcu_struct_quiesced'; did you mean 'cleanup_srcu_struct'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > cleanup_srcu_struct_quiesced(&user->release_barrier); > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > cleanup_srcu_struct > > > > Caused by commit > > > > 487ecb21fa66 ("ipmi: fix sleep-in-atomic in free_user at cleanup SRCU user->release_barrier") > > > > interacting with commit > > > > f5ad3991493c ("srcu: Remove cleanup_srcu_struct_quiesced()") > > > > from the rcu tree. > > > > Based on the comments in the rcu tree commit, I have reverted the impi > > tree commit for today. > > > > -- > > Cheers, > > Stephen Rothwell > >