From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F839C3F2CD for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:59:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FF952469D for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:59:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=canb.auug.org.au header.i=@canb.auug.org.au header.b="PDTK2fj1" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730155AbgB1A71 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Feb 2020 19:59:27 -0500 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.11.71.1]:41333 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729984AbgB1A71 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Feb 2020 19:59:27 -0500 Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48TB5924hGz9sNg; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 11:59:25 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=canb.auug.org.au; s=201702; t=1582851565; bh=sbrHA+2CLAAtQ546tfdv1f9Yijrk5msDUuMBBWHSsTE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=PDTK2fj1cMUCzo0og3kK/58AHggyBDys5BdI234IQAr2gqjhh1HlhyX1DzhCeBlg4 v6T7xFrieSFG7eC+YsYACBp8ykWf7Sy70xfkkB/VlZGhrIX53a+iShFJCDOrZdCV06 DYXJ5sdD/nxC6cDSO4d9P1NWMevqAqQCTL7JPo8Y4b6GjX41/yASfpVffHTvShM5IF SkgcStAZ4xVzKXMFQrdZ1OSXC+gGBKQSN3jtlQ1vhz2AiC34PNWdK3tcC8ztNeSYtJ MPrKkYO4vjX/0YMppQmyf/aqpIoGOw9gGHkBbbZdHUDg3435Xic3/Ml5baEax7srhU wICO23OUlrmpg== Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 11:59:23 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Arjun Roy Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Andrew Morton , Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , David Miller , Soheil Hassas Yeganeh Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree Message-ID: <20200228115923.1d697cff@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: References: <20200227151143.6a6edaf9@canb.auug.org.au> <20200228082831.0149e354@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/S3k1cQyv/vm1HYzF+t3B6KV"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org --Sig_/S3k1cQyv/vm1HYzF+t3B6KV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Arjun, On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 16:34:48 -0800 Arjun Roy wrote: > > Agreed on sparc64; I think the sparc32 patch ought to be reverted, > though (since pte_index may be meaningless to it). Agreed. I will replace the sparc32 patch with your new ones in today's linux-next. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell --Sig_/S3k1cQyv/vm1HYzF+t3B6KV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAl5YZesACgkQAVBC80lX 0GykyQf/Vh8WCiepSShXyOJjy2Ie+TwWFyLca+s9G+S0xaXktDBvLbGnNXzGhlQw tdUieRmtvq7aGrXEwT49KBdCqY5uv/Ya0bycVIk3go0vN9GNgidWWnz9/km5G9no +C6Ksm8mPx3scTJVtInwV0WeB7czxgmJBOzoKh+gq1Tqr5GdxUdfGB9z/Uhi3/41 +8CdbxlT2N/4e7btmr+wBj/ldysPTIuN0SeprZqe13uIRwypPN6jgLZIn0XE+HOf edh/T2OZBNHjnQrJkMEjEH1X3qspvgG++T3LDtT5EQVAMAn+KHcEEPhD/VB9w8+n SWRFv2hwemAhJ4X1OBSNXv5drsTEhA== =fMwu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/S3k1cQyv/vm1HYzF+t3B6KV--