From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FB5AC43464 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 22:01:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D686F214D8 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 22:01:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1600380106; bh=iSS3yVNSP4VslVAf8MgGuHdapmuSuK442eTIBtSj0SU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Reply-To:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID: From; b=r/DaLmpuYaCcI3jGbVLLef7DF7sflKGBl3DzywVqiRusdLfszh++ZCQ3TmBGm5ivu /CgWtN13WRj+Dv73cOtQcPGGmIVIlW9//6StwJmhiut9EFN0kKU83UmmZXn8yF8Lpd VtIoJ+7p0itXtDDCM8ZsYc1/azRD+v0XSc/3eQ/E= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726097AbgIQWBq (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Sep 2020 18:01:46 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:59670 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725886AbgIQWBq (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Sep 2020 18:01:46 -0400 Received: from paulmck-ThinkPad-P72.home (unknown [50.45.173.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E139E20872; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 22:01:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1600380105; bh=iSS3yVNSP4VslVAf8MgGuHdapmuSuK442eTIBtSj0SU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Reply-To:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=JdyyX1wORgeZqLB4rR/p3TPUNlpPVkqqJ657t4PhebdQfbw0Ev0DT1jcr6HG97ANB N18Wv8e6+aFtBIIkCP80aoptKXbo6cAujzY5y4n/MwasGqTASCi26E9OLh4lpMSf4Y gULHhI2/+P+pI/Qti6wnlx0iHhGWN7usS0rn9Y0c= Received: by paulmck-ThinkPad-P72.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A63313522887; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 15:01:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 15:01:45 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the rcu tree Message-ID: <20200917220145.GQ29330@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> Reply-To: paulmck@kernel.org References: <20200917151909.01fa6684@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200917151909.01fa6684@canb.auug.org.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 03:19:09PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > After merging the rcu tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this: > > In file included from kernel/rcu/update.c:578: > kernel/rcu/tasks.h:601:20: error: static declaration of 'show_rcu_tasks_classic_gp_kthread' follows non-static declaration > 601 | static inline void show_rcu_tasks_classic_gp_kthread(void) { } > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > In file included from kernel/rcu/update.c:49: > kernel/rcu/rcu.h:537:6: note: previous declaration of 'show_rcu_tasks_classic_gp_kthread' was here > 537 | void show_rcu_tasks_classic_gp_kthread(void); > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > Caused by commit > > 675d3ca52626 ("rcutorture: Make grace-period kthread report match RCU flavor being tested") > > I have used the rcu tree from next-20200916 for today. Please accept my apologies for the hassle! I believe that I finally have this straightened out. Please ignore if you already pulled -rcu for today, as I previously set rcu/next back to a commit preceding the offending one. Thanx, Paul