From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF3CDC41604 for ; Sat, 3 Oct 2020 21:54:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F67D206C3 for ; Sat, 3 Oct 2020 21:54:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.b="iVI4RMx/" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726025AbgJCVyx (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Oct 2020 17:54:53 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33512 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725913AbgJCVyu (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Oct 2020 17:54:50 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x1043.google.com (mail-pj1-x1043.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1043]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E709C0613E7 for ; Sat, 3 Oct 2020 14:54:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x1043.google.com with SMTP id t7so3287038pjd.3 for ; Sat, 03 Oct 2020 14:54:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=RqVHPpZ6Wz7y1+qhwZaYda5zEvzwd+4/97qb+/erIeo=; b=iVI4RMx/f3DX40AitIt+awPfWkymQBZUzPMOfOvbos7d+O0YpuhCZ0nZKLz1SAknKu V6eh/IQPihzXGVhKVPDP33OdAiMOOmEnPjUUbBo+fDqmSf3euzzmJfeZTpOynE5EJH5R e7MiKwdPDf2Cvk4qehTFpYc7rK4s24OyUDaW0= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=RqVHPpZ6Wz7y1+qhwZaYda5zEvzwd+4/97qb+/erIeo=; b=K29q5WrSY6jlgFLvXYK7NbtI038RkLdylCN7B9AjoxRJXzlPrUosaI93F4z20glAFT tSKyOQR9DdNH50I+rGUOxZPw+sISQooqVEXyQCcXKCub+6LRpoCc3lsda3uC1lbcB5oW XW8Z2yXhNSbBBgjQWO8d82BGwSeRYSct/8+2mGwYfxoAOa4xRWmImZ4dJ9X/OsB37x6g x4xlqEreDr/HSaAdzmaQv8QIxowiMHcSBgJbVlYzRZuei87u2stNBa7a4IfNbpQX9kcI J30/lY6VG9H93Up4TyCsjJ77XAh1eBbyiyPgZIjLFIG18S6SBHktJX6GiSUyJKs1NOel 4zNw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5336k9nLaxgO8xOhReYd7Xkdv4SZnmuRWMbL47g8nmQFFLjNHG18 Xou1MtB/YdV8zmToJgDv37ukIw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxM2a12aykn6gYP6up7MCND60ZS6yo1DT9rpBCVWJnVU7cN/sF3yqufCX7M4KT2TFwREgrfqQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3882:: with SMTP id mu2mr8605760pjb.29.1601762088609; Sat, 03 Oct 2020 14:54:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.outflux.net (smtp.outflux.net. [198.145.64.163]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id gp8sm5528308pjb.3.2020.10.03.14.54.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 03 Oct 2020 14:54:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2020 14:54:46 -0700 From: Kees Cook To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the tip tree Message-ID: <202010031451.ABC49D88@keescook> References: <20200914132249.40c88461@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200914132249.40c88461@canb.auug.org.au> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 01:22:49PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) > produced this warning: > > x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: warning: orphan section `.ctors.65435' from `kernel/trace/trace_selftest_dynamic.o' being placed in section `.ctors.65435' > [...] Is it only trace that is warning? > gcc (Debian 10.2.0-5) 10.2.0 > GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35 I can't reproduce this with: gcc (Ubuntu 10.2.0-11ubuntu1) 10.2.0 GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.35.1 Are you running Debian testing or unstable? (I see binutils 2.35.1 is in both, so was this fixed in the .1?) I will go build a Debian testing container... -- Kees Cook