Hi Michael, On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 11:19:45 +1100 Michael Ellerman wrote: > > Stephen Rothwell writes: > > > > On Wed, 09 Dec 2020 15:44:35 +1100 Michael Ellerman wrote: > >> > >> They should really be in DATA_DATA or similar shouldn't they? > > > > No other architecture appears t need them ... > > Any arch with orphan-handling=warn should see them I thought? I did an x86_64 allyesconfig build (same compiler (more or less) and same source) and it produces none of these sections. The only difference in UBSAN CONFIG_ options was that CONFIG_UBSAN_UNREACHABLE is not set in the x86_64 build. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell