linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pm tree
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2017 14:09:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2116937.mQ1ftdtgHJ@aspire.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171106131040.6777cb03@canb.auug.org.au>

On Monday, November 6, 2017 3:10:40 AM CET Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   drivers/idle/intel_idle.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   0563bb7ba67e ("intel_idle: replace conditionals with static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ARAT)")
> 
> from the pm tree and commit:
> 
>   675357362aeb ("Revert "x86/mm: Stop calling leave_mm() in idle code"")
> 
> from the tip tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

The fix looks good to me, thanks!

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-06 13:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-06  2:10 linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pm tree Stephen Rothwell
2017-11-06 13:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-02-17  5:07 Stephen Rothwell
2021-02-17 10:15 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-02-22  0:34 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-10-08  2:44 Stephen Rothwell
2018-10-08 10:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-10-08 10:34   ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-10-08  2:40 Stephen Rothwell
2018-10-08 10:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-10-08 10:41   ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-03-23  2:20 Stephen Rothwell
2018-03-23  6:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-03-23 21:09   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-24  8:15     ` Ingo Molnar
2017-08-11  4:06 Stephen Rothwell
2017-09-04  4:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-11-22  5:48 Stephen Rothwell
2016-06-09  4:34 Stephen Rothwell
2016-04-19  2:59 Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-15  1:55 Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-11  1:57 Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-11 13:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-29  4:42 Stephen Rothwell
2015-10-06  3:07 Stephen Rothwell
2015-03-31  7:58 Stephen Rothwell
2015-03-31 22:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-31  7:10 Stephen Rothwell
2014-12-15  2:30 Stephen Rothwell
2014-11-25  5:46 Stephen Rothwell
2014-11-25 21:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-08-04  6:55 Stephen Rothwell
2014-05-09  4:49 Stephen Rothwell
2014-01-13  3:29 Stephen Rothwell
2014-01-07  4:20 Stephen Rothwell
2014-01-06  7:18 Stephen Rothwell
2013-08-19  4:09 Stephen Rothwell
2013-04-11  4:08 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2116937.mQ1ftdtgHJ@aspire.rjw.lan \
    --to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).