linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rdma tree with Linus' tree
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 23:24:33 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2443017de714630058322853d4fff5213f039e56.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190620120640.5dbcc599@canb.auug.org.au>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1035 bytes --]

On Thu, 2019-06-20 at 12:06 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   dc1435c00fcd ("RDMA/srp: Rename SRP sysfs name after IB device
> rename trigger")
> 
> from Linus' tree and commit:
> 
>   0e2d00eb6fd4 ("RDMA: Add NLDEV_GET_CHARDEV to allow char dev
> discovery and autoload")
> 
> from the rdma tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your
> tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 

Yep, this one was expected.  Thanks.

-- 
Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
    GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
    Fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B  1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-20  3:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-20  2:06 linux-next: manual merge of the rdma tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2019-06-20  3:24 ` Doug Ledford [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-06-22  1:52 Stephen Rothwell
2021-05-21  0:34 Stephen Rothwell
2021-04-15  2:05 Stephen Rothwell
2021-02-10  2:15 Stephen Rothwell
2021-02-10 18:57 ` Pearson, Robert B
2021-02-10 20:36   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-02-10 22:08     ` Pearson, Robert B
2021-02-11 20:03       ` Martin Wilck
2019-11-05  1:17 Stephen Rothwell
2019-11-05  2:21 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-11-05  2:28   ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-10-24  0:01 Stephen Rothwell
2019-10-28 19:30 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-20  2:10 Stephen Rothwell
2019-06-20  3:25 ` Doug Ledford
2019-06-14  3:00 Stephen Rothwell
2019-06-14 13:11 ` Doug Ledford
2018-09-28  0:01 Stephen Rothwell
2018-09-29  2:57 ` Parav Pandit
2018-08-06  2:01 Stephen Rothwell
2018-08-06 19:41 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-08-06 21:49   ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-08-08  2:11 Stephen Rothwell
2017-07-14  1:14 Stephen Rothwell
2017-07-14  1:17 ` Doug Ledford
2017-07-14  3:34   ` Leon Romanovsky
2017-07-14  3:50     ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-07-14  4:55       ` Leon Romanovsky
2017-07-14 12:03         ` Doug Ledford
2017-07-14 13:46           ` Leon Romanovsky
2017-07-14  4:12     ` Doug Ledford
2017-07-14  4:54       ` Leon Romanovsky
2017-07-14 14:33         ` Doug Ledford
2017-07-14 15:10           ` Leon Romanovsky
2016-12-15  0:47 Stephen Rothwell
2016-10-10  0:59 Stephen Rothwell
2016-10-10  0:54 Stephen Rothwell
2016-08-05  1:05 Stephen Rothwell
2016-08-05  1:01 Stephen Rothwell
2016-08-05  0:52 Stephen Rothwell
2016-05-19  1:45 Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-22  0:33 Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-22  0:29 Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-22  0:24 Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-22  0:17 Stephen Rothwell
2015-11-01  7:48 Stephen Rothwell
2015-11-02 10:40 ` Sagi Grimberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2443017de714630058322853d4fff5213f039e56.camel@redhat.com \
    --to=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
    --cc=leonro@mellanox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).