From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sachin Sant Subject: Re: Next May 11 : BUG during scsi initialization Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 21:49:55 +0530 Message-ID: <4A08502B.9040001@in.ibm.com> References: <20090511161442.3e9d9cb9.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4A081002.4050802@in.ibm.com> <20090511115233.GB8112@parisc-linux.org> <4A081437.7000409@in.ibm.com> <20090511122135.GC8112@parisc-linux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from e28smtp09.in.ibm.com ([59.145.155.9]:41671 "EHLO e28smtp09.in.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751531AbZEKQUA (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 May 2009 12:20:00 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090511122135.GC8112@parisc-linux.org> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Pekka Enberg , Nick Piggin Matthew Wilcox wrote: >> Default one. SLQB >> >> CONFIG_SLQB_ALLOCATOR=y >> CONFIG_SLQB=y >> >> Page size is 64K with Config DEBUG_PAGEALLOC set. >> >> CONFIG_PPC_HAS_HASH_64K=y >> CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES=y >> CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC=y >> > > Hm. We've seen some similar problems at Intel while doing database > performance tests with SLQB. Any ideas, Nick? > Yeah so the problem seems to be with SLQB. I was able to boot Next 11 with SLUB on the same machine. Thanks -Sachin -- --------------------------------- Sachin Sant IBM Linux Technology Center India Systems and Technology Labs Bangalore, India ---------------------------------