From: czankel <chris@zankel.net>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the xtensa tree
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 19:38:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52D35FAF.5050805@zankel.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140113142642.6e1944155b1db50d2c70abb4@canb.auug.org.au>
Hi Stephen,
Thanks for the fix! I actually just got an updated set for most of the
patches currently in the for_next tree for xtensa and might have to do a
rebase to integrate them better. I'll include your fix when I come
across the issue.
Thanks again,
-Chris
On 1/12/14 7:26 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in
> arch/xtensa/include/asm/barrier.h between commit dbacef090841 ("xtensa:
> add SMP support") from the xtensa tree and commit 93ea02bb8435 ("arch:
> Clean up asm/barrier.h implementations using asm-generic/barrier.h") from
> the tip tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I am pretty sure - see below) and can carry the fix as
> necessary (no action is required).
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-13 3:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-13 3:26 linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the xtensa tree Stephen Rothwell
2014-01-13 3:38 ` czankel [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-11-11 3:31 Stephen Rothwell
2019-11-11 10:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-11-26 21:33 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-01-13 3:26 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52D35FAF.5050805@zankel.net \
--to=chris@zankel.net \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).