Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 14

[Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>]

On 11/16/2014 12:37 AM, Jiang Liu wrote:
>
>
> On 2014/11/16 16:24, Jiang Liu wrote:
>> On 2014/11/16 14:56, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>> On 11/15/2014 08:20 PM, Jiang Liu wrote:
>>>
>>> I took the configuration file I had for the SMP case (located in the same
>>> directory in the git repository), disabled SMP, and ran "make
>>> savedefconfig".
>>> "old" is relative in this context; I don't usually create new configuration
>>> files for each new kernel release, so, yes, you could say that the file
>>> I used is "old".
>>>
>>> CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC is enabled. Keep in mind this is a configuration file
>>> created with "make savedefconfig", so default settings are not included.
>>> Correct, CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC is not enabled, but that is not really
>>> surprising
>>> since its dependencies are not met as far as I can see.
>>>
>>> Overall, I am not sure I understand what you are trying to say. X86_IO_APIC
>>> depends on X86_64 (not set) or SMP (not set) or X86_32_NON_STANDARD (not
>>> set)
>>> or X86_UP_IOAPIC (not set because it depends on X86_UP_APIC which
>>> depends on
>>> !PCI_MSI).
>>>
>>> Does that mean that I'll have to disable PCI_MSI to get x86 uniprocessor
>>> support to work after your patch ?
>> Hi Guenter,
>> 	Previously, X86_IO_APIC will be enabled if PCI_MSI is enabled.
>> With my patch, x86_IO_APIC may be disabled even if PCI_MSI is enabled.
>> If X86_LOCAL_APIC/PCI_MSI are enabled and X86_IO_APIC is disabled, it
>> should work theoretically. I remember it works on my HP laptop.
>> Could you please help to check whether it solve the issue by manually
>> turning on X86_IO_APIC?
> Or could you please help to apply this patch?
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/408402/
>

That patch does not help, unfortunately. The problem is exactly the same
after applying it.

Guenter