From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
To: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 2 (lib/ubsan.c)
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 07:38:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <84531c68-2ac8-924b-5e71-077f9abb2503@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFd5g44g6OrL3fxQNRZ1rR0PruAty8tBZr8JDzM-oonZJRDZyw@mail.gmail.com>
On 9/4/20 12:59 AM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 11:12 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 9/2/20 8:44 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>> On 9/2/20 1:09 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Changes since 20200828:
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> on i386:
>>>
>>> ../lib/ubsan.c: In function ‘ubsan_prologue’:
>>> ../lib/ubsan.c:141:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘kunit_fail_current_test’; did you mean ‘kunit_init_test’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>> kunit_fail_current_test();
>>>
>>>
>>> Full randconfig file is attached.
>>>
>>
>> Hi Brendan,
>>
>> Do you know anything about this build error?
>>
>> I can't find kunit_fail_current_test() anywhere.
>
> Yeah, this got applied for some reason without the prerequisite
> patches. It is from a two patch series, the other being here:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20200813205722.1384108-1-urielguajardojr@gmail.com/
>
> which in turn depends on another patchset which didn't make it into 5.9.
>
> Again, I don't know why this was applied without it's prereqs. Sorry about that.
>
Well. Who is responsible for this small mess?
It is still killing linux-next builds for me (2020-0908).
--
~Randy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-08 16:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-02 8:09 linux-next: Tree for Sep 2 Stephen Rothwell
2020-09-02 15:44 ` linux-next: Tree for Sep 2 (lib/ubsan.c) Randy Dunlap
2020-09-04 6:12 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-09-04 7:59 ` Brendan Higgins
2020-09-08 14:38 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2020-09-09 0:46 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-09-09 0:49 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-09-09 0:55 ` Shuah Khan
2020-09-10 9:42 ` Brendan Higgins
2020-09-02 16:17 ` linux-next: Tree for Sep 2 (ip_tunnel, ip6_vti, sit, ip6_tunnel) Randy Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=84531c68-2ac8-924b-5e71-077f9abb2503@infradead.org \
--to=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).