From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
DRI <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel tree with Linus' tree
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 13:02:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878rkd4x49.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57f57c29-cf48-67c1-b6b3-0e50e7105031@redhat.com>
On Mon, 14 Nov 2022, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11/14/22 11:10, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Mon, 14 Nov 2022, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 11/14/22 00:23, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Today's linux-next merge of the drm-intel tree got a conflict in:
>>>>
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c
>>>>
>>>> between commit:
>>>>
>>>> b1d36e73cc1c ("drm/i915: Don't register backlight when another backlight should be used (v2)")
>>>>
>>>> from Linus' tree and commit:
>>>>
>>>> 801543b2593b ("drm/i915: stop including i915_irq.h from i915_trace.h")
>>>>
>>>> from the drm-intel tree.
>>>
>>> This is weird, because the:
>>>
>>> b1d36e73cc1c ("drm/i915: Don't register backlight when another backlight should be used (v2)")
>>>
>>> commit is in 6.1-rc1, so there can only be a conflict it 6.1-rc1 has not
>>> been back-merged into drm-intel yet ?
>>
>> That's the reason it *is* a conflict, right?
>
> Right what I was trying to say is that I am surprised that 6.1-rc1 has not
> been back-merged into drm-intel yet even though it has been released
> 4 weeks ago.
Right, -ENOCOFFEE at my end.
> I thought it was more or less standard process to backmerge rc1 soon after
> it is released ?
The delay may be because v6.1-rc1 brought in more regressions for us
than any other -rc1 in recent memory. Our CI's been suffering, and our
folks have been spending a lot of time debugging, bisecting and
reporting. (And before you ask, yes, we're going to be more proactive in
reporting issues we find in linux-next.)
That said, Rodrigo's been in charge of drm-intel-next this cycle, maybe
it's time to backmerge drm-next?
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-14 11:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-13 23:23 linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2022-11-14 8:19 ` Hans de Goede
2022-11-14 10:10 ` Jani Nikula
2022-11-14 10:35 ` Hans de Goede
2022-11-14 11:02 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2022-11-14 19:29 ` [Intel-gfx] " Rodrigo Vivi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-01-09 0:22 Stephen Rothwell
2023-11-22 0:51 Stephen Rothwell
2023-11-22 1:10 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-03-06 23:09 Stephen Rothwell
2022-10-17 22:05 Stephen Rothwell
2022-06-07 23:59 Stephen Rothwell
2022-06-07 23:53 Stephen Rothwell
2022-04-05 1:00 Stephen Rothwell
2022-04-05 0:53 Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-24 22:39 Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-24 22:33 Stephen Rothwell
2021-08-02 15:29 Mark Brown
2021-05-20 0:19 Stephen Rothwell
2021-05-21 1:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-05-12 0:28 Stephen Rothwell
2020-09-08 4:00 Stephen Rothwell
2020-09-08 8:22 ` Hans de Goede
2020-09-08 11:04 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-09-08 13:20 ` Hans de Goede
2020-06-23 1:35 Stephen Rothwell
2018-03-22 2:21 Stephen Rothwell
2018-03-23 0:50 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-09-19 1:42 Stephen Rothwell
2016-09-16 0:38 Stephen Rothwell
2016-09-08 2:08 Stephen Rothwell
2016-05-31 1:06 Stephen Rothwell
2016-05-31 1:00 Stephen Rothwell
2015-12-22 1:03 Stephen Rothwell
2015-11-19 0:23 Stephen Rothwell
2015-09-29 1:20 Stephen Rothwell
2015-09-29 1:20 Stephen Rothwell
2015-09-17 0:13 Stephen Rothwell
2015-07-09 1:02 Stephen Rothwell
2015-04-29 1:15 Stephen Rothwell
2014-09-08 4:32 Stephen Rothwell
2013-12-18 2:50 Stephen Rothwell
2013-12-13 0:58 Stephen Rothwell
2013-09-18 1:25 Stephen Rothwell
2013-09-18 1:20 Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-26 3:54 Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-17 3:32 Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-17 3:25 Stephen Rothwell
2013-05-21 1:58 Stephen Rothwell
2013-05-07 1:27 Stephen Rothwell
2013-05-07 8:43 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-05-08 0:11 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-04-03 2:43 Stephen Rothwell
2013-04-03 8:31 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-04-02 2:46 Stephen Rothwell
2013-03-04 23:23 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878rkd4x49.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).