From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 08:10:26 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20110912120501.764336af05069fa23a371b5e@canb.auug.org.au> <4E6D6C0D.60100@codeaurora.org> <20110913115533.403d4fe6d961ccc8ba9b58b7@canb.auug.org.au> <20111103130924.5811caec6db378f467006fc3@canb.auug.org.au> <20111103022252.GA23489@huya.qualcomm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:56304 "EHLO mail-ww0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755396Ab1KCPKt (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Nov 2011 11:10:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20111103022252.GA23489@huya.qualcomm.com> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: David Brown Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Arnd Bergmann , Stephen Boyd , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Russell King On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 7:22 PM, David Brown wrote: > > I think I'm just going to have to convince our bootloader people to > actually pass in the right memory information in the first place. I have to say that it would be a wonderful change of pace to see fixes at that level instead of the continual horrible platform hacks. So an enthusiastic "yes please" from me on that subject, Linus