From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
"arm@kernel.org" <arm@kernel.org>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the gpio tree
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 08:37:00 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABGGisyhjtJN=Rgjb0MS9vg+TH2M8Rir27GNyv8jAT2LibjASg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdahm-N7JyKQ8LA69qjvPG6Vf4TRKx67emxxFKVdszGiNA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 1:42 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 4:51 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>> On Fri, 3 Nov 2017 16:37:24 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>>>
>>> After merging the gpio tree, yesterday's linux-next build (arm
>>> multi_v7_defconfig) produced these warnings:
>>>
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-b.dtb: Warning (phys_property): Missing property '#phy-cells' in node /phy or bad phandle (referred from /soc/usb@7e980000:phys[0])
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-b-rev2.dtb: Warning (phys_property): Missing property '#phy-cells' in node /phy or bad phandle (referred from /soc/usb@7e980000:phys[0])
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-a.dtb: Warning (phys_property): Missing property '#phy-cells' in node /phy or bad phandle (referred from /soc/usb@7e980000:phys[0])
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-b-plus.dtb: Warning (phys_property): Missing property '#phy-cells' in node /phy or bad phandle (referred from /soc/usb@7e980000:phys[0])
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-a-plus.dtb: Warning (phys_property): Missing property '#phy-cells' in node /phy or bad phandle (referred from /soc/usb@7e980000:phys[0])
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2836-rpi-2-b.dtb: Warning (phys_property): Missing property '#phy-cells' in node /phy or bad phandle (referred from /soc/usb@7e980000:phys[0])
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2837-rpi-3-b.dtb: Warning (phys_property): Missing property '#phy-cells' in node /phy or bad phandle (referred from /soc/usb@7e980000:phys[0])
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-zero.dtb: Warning (phys_property): Missing property '#phy-cells' in node /phy or bad phandle (referred from /soc/usb@7e980000:phys[0])
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-zero-w.dtb: Warning (phys_property): Missing property '#phy-cells' in node /phy or bad phandle (referred from /soc/usb@7e980000:phys[0])
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5410-odroidxu.dtb: Warning (interrupts_property): Missing interrupt-controller or interrupt-map property in /soc/system-controller@10040000
>>>
>>> and many, many more.
>>>
>>> I have no idea what caused this.
>>
>> I am still getting lots of these ...
>
> I have absolutely no clue either.
>
> What I know is that there is a device tree compiler warning that can
> be turned on, and
> it generates these warnings a lot. The actual problems have been in
> the DTS files
> forever. They just recently started to look into them.
>
> It has nothing to do with the GPIO tree whatsoever, so I wonder if it
> is a side effect of
> something else?
There's a dtc update in -next which adds these new checks. It's been
there for over a month now. Unlike other dtc checks, these are
generally actual errors, so they are not off by default (enabled with
W=1,2).
In reality, there's only about 50-100 warnings. The way dts includes
are structured and because the dtc checks don't have the original
source file lines, it just multiplies the warnings.
Rob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-09 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-03 5:37 linux-next: build warnings after merge of the gpio tree Stephen Rothwell
2017-11-09 3:51 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-11-09 7:42 ` Linus Walleij
2017-11-09 14:37 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2017-11-15 22:42 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-11-15 23:12 ` Rob Herring
2017-11-15 23:39 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-12-05 22:48 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-12-06 20:51 ` Rob Herring
2017-12-07 15:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-07-23 8:45 Stephen Rothwell
2014-07-23 8:46 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CABGGisyhjtJN=Rgjb0MS9vg+TH2M8Rir27GNyv8jAT2LibjASg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=arm@kernel.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).