From: Benjamin Block <bblock@linux.ibm.com>
To: Steffen Maier <maier@linux.ibm.com>, bvanassche@acm.org
Cc: jwi@linux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
jejb@linux.ibm.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] scsi: core: Fix early registration of sysfs attributes for scsi_device
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 12:00:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YXfRvxKu/xXVubF8@t480-pf1aa2c2.linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211026014240.4098365-1-maier@linux.ibm.com>
On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 03:42:40AM +0200, Steffen Maier wrote:
> v4.17 commit 86b87cde0b55 ("scsi: core: host template attribute groups")
> introduced explicit sysfs_create_groups() in scsi_sysfs_add_sdev()
> and sysfs_remove_groups() in __scsi_remove_device(), both for sdev_gendev,
> based on a new field const struct attribute_group **sdev_groups
> of struct scsi_host_template.
>
> Commit 92c4b58b15c5 ("scsi: core: Register sysfs attributes earlier")
> removed above explicit (de)registration of scsi_device attribute groups.
> It also converted all scsi_device attributes and attribute_groups to
> end up in a new field const struct attribute_group *gendev_attr_groups[6]
> of struct scsi_device. However, that new field was not used anywhere.
Oh.. damn, I didn't notice either.
>
> Surprisingly, this only caused missing LLDD specific scsi_device sysfs
> attributes. Whereas, scsi core attributes from scsi_sdev_attr_groups
> did continue to exist because of scsi_dev_type.groups.
Hmm, maybe this is out of scope for this fix, but couldn't we
essentially do the same thing for the host attributes. Have the
`shost_class` take the `scsi_shost_attr_group` as default attributes for
the shost class, and then assign the `shost_groups` from the LLDD
template to `shost_dev.groups` as optional attributes?
Then we get rid of the indirection loop in `hosts.c` as well, that was
introduce with he original patch by Bart.
Just a shot in the dark, I don't know whether the `struct class` behaves
the same in this case as `struct device_type`.
>
> We separate scsi core attibutes from LLDD specific attributes.
> Hence, we keep the initializing assignment scsi_dev_type =
> { .groups = scsi_sdev_attr_groups, } as this takes care of core
> attributes. Without the separation, it would cause attribute double
> registration due to scsi_dev_type.groups and sdev_gendev.groups.
>
> Julian suggested to assign the sdev_groups pointer of the
> scsi_host_template directly to the groups pointer of sdev_gendev.
> This way we can delete the container scsi_device.gendev_attr_groups
> and the loop copying each entry from hostt->sdev_groups to
> sdev->gendev_attr_groups.
>
> Alternative approaches ruled out:
> Assigning gendev_attr_groups to sdev_dev has no visible effect.
> Assigning sdev->gendev_attr_groups to scsi_dev_type.groups
> caused scsi_device of all scsi host types to get LLDD specific
> attributes of the LLDD for which the last sdev alloc happened to occur,
> as that overwrote scsi_dev_type.groups,
> e.g. scsi_debug had zfcp-specific scsi_device attributes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Steffen Maier <maier@linux.ibm.com>
> Fixes: 92c4b58b15c5 ("scsi: core: Register sysfs attributes earlier")
> Suggested-by: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.ibm.com>
--
Best Regards, Benjamin Block / Linux on IBM Z Kernel Development / IBM Systems
IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH / https://www.ibm.com/privacy
Vorsitz. AufsR.: Gregor Pillen / Geschäftsführung: Dirk Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen / Registergericht: AmtsG Stuttgart, HRB 243294
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-26 10:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20211012233558.4066756-1-bvanassche@acm.org>
[not found] ` <163478764102.7011.9375895285870786953.b4-ty@oracle.com>
2021-10-23 20:54 ` Missing driver-specific sysfs attributes of scsi_device [was: Re: [PATCH v4 00/46] Register SCSI sysfs attributes earlier] Steffen Maier
2021-10-24 0:39 ` Steffen Maier
2021-10-24 2:55 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-10-24 11:18 ` [PATCH] scsi: core: Fix early registration of sysfs attributes for scsi_device Steffen Maier
2021-10-24 21:25 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-10-24 22:16 ` [PATCH v2] " Steffen Maier
2021-10-25 9:23 ` Julian Wiedmann
2021-10-25 16:00 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-10-26 1:42 ` [PATCH v3] " Steffen Maier
2021-10-26 10:00 ` Benjamin Block [this message]
2021-10-26 21:48 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-10-29 17:55 ` Benjamin Block
2021-10-26 18:31 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-10-29 17:56 ` Benjamin Block
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YXfRvxKu/xXVubF8@t480-pf1aa2c2.linux.ibm.com \
--to=bblock@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jwi@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maier@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).