linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>,
	Scott Mayhew <smayhew@redhat.com>,
	Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SUNRPC: Fix disconnection races
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 17:06:36 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1D3503CB-1B9A-459B-980B-A71D0191CFA9@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181217200524.105368-1-trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>



> On Dec 17, 2018, at 3:05 PM, Trond Myklebust <trondmy@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> When the socket is closed, we need to call xprt_disconnect_done() in order
> to clean up the XPRT_WRITE_SPACE flag, and wake up the sleeping tasks.
> 
> However, we also want to ensure that we don't wake them up before the socket
> is closed, since that would cause thundering herd issues with everyone
> piling up to retransmit before the TCP shutdown dance has completed.
> Only the task that holds XPRT_LOCKED needs to wake up early in order to
> allow the close to complete.
> 
> Reported-by: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
> Reported-by: Scott Mayhew <smayhew@redhat.com>
> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
> ---
> net/sunrpc/xprt.c     |  4 +++-
> net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c | 10 ++++------
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprt.c b/net/sunrpc/xprt.c
> index ce927002862a..089e53a87379 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/xprt.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprt.c
> @@ -680,7 +680,9 @@ void xprt_force_disconnect(struct rpc_xprt *xprt)
> 	/* Try to schedule an autoclose RPC call */
> 	if (test_and_set_bit(XPRT_LOCKED, &xprt->state) == 0)
> 		queue_work(xprtiod_workqueue, &xprt->task_cleanup);
> -	xprt_wake_pending_tasks(xprt, -EAGAIN);
> +	else if (xprt->snd_task)
> +		rpc_wake_up_queued_task_set_status(&xprt->pending,
> +				xprt->snd_task, -ENOTCONN);
> 	spin_unlock_bh(&xprt->transport_lock);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xprt_force_disconnect);

Hrm, well I'm not sure xprt_connect_status is ready to deal with -ENOTCONN.

     kworker/2:3-2342  [002]  3706.246289: rpc_task_wakeup:      task:39992@5 flags=0001 state=001e status=-107 timeout=120000 queue=xprt_pending
     kworker/0:7-2424  [000]  3706.246296: xprtrdma_reconnect:   peer=[192.168.2.55]:20049 r_xprt=0xffff88886c465000
  kworker/u25:28-2270  [004]  3706.246321: rpc_task_run_action:  task:39992@5 flags=0001 state=001d status=-107 action=xprt_connect_status
  kworker/u25:28-2270  [004]  3706.246323: rpc_task_run_action:  task:39992@5 flags=0001 state=001d status=-5 action=call_connect_status
  kworker/u25:28-2270  [004]  3706.246323: rpc_connect_status:   task:39992@5 status=-5
  kworker/u25:28-2270  [004]  3706.246324: rpc_task_run_action:  task:39992@5 flags=0001 state=001d status=-5 action=rpc_exit_task
  kworker/u25:28-2270  [004]  3706.246327: rpc_stats_latency:    task:39992@5 xid=0x2f1ad350 nfsv3 READ backlog=0 rtt=0 execute=13028
  kworker/u25:28-2270  [004]  3706.246333: xprtrdma_rpc_done:    task:39992@5 req=0xffff88886a438000 rep=(nil)

static void xprt_connect_status(struct rpc_task *task)
{
        switch (task->tk_status) {
        case 0:
                dprintk("RPC: %5u xprt_connect_status: connection established\n",
                                task->tk_pid);
                break;
        case -ECONNREFUSED:
        case -ECONNRESET:
        case -ECONNABORTED:
        case -ENETUNREACH:
        case -EHOSTUNREACH:
        case -EPIPE:
        case -EAGAIN:
                dprintk("RPC: %5u xprt_connect_status: retrying\n", task->tk_pid);
                break;
        case -ETIMEDOUT:
                dprintk("RPC: %5u xprt_connect_status: connect attempt timed "
                                "out\n", task->tk_pid);
                break;
        default:
                dprintk("RPC: %5u xprt_connect_status: error %d connecting to "
                                "server %s\n", task->tk_pid, -task->tk_status,
                                task->tk_rqstp->rq_xprt->servername);
                task->tk_status = -EIO;
        }    
}

Maybe the wake-up status should remain -EAGAIN ?


> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
> index 8a5e823e0b33..f0b3700cec95 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
> @@ -1217,6 +1217,8 @@ static void xs_reset_transport(struct sock_xprt *transport)
> 
> 	trace_rpc_socket_close(xprt, sock);
> 	sock_release(sock);
> +
> +	xprt_disconnect_done(xprt);
> }
> 
> /**
> @@ -1237,8 +1239,6 @@ static void xs_close(struct rpc_xprt *xprt)
> 
> 	xs_reset_transport(transport);
> 	xprt->reestablish_timeout = 0;
> -
> -	xprt_disconnect_done(xprt);
> }
> 
> static void xs_inject_disconnect(struct rpc_xprt *xprt)
> @@ -1489,8 +1489,6 @@ static void xs_tcp_state_change(struct sock *sk)
> 					&transport->sock_state))
> 			xprt_clear_connecting(xprt);
> 		clear_bit(XPRT_CLOSING, &xprt->state);
> -		if (sk->sk_err)
> -			xprt_wake_pending_tasks(xprt, -sk->sk_err);
> 		/* Trigger the socket release */
> 		xs_tcp_force_close(xprt);
> 	}
> @@ -2092,8 +2090,8 @@ static void xs_udp_setup_socket(struct work_struct *work)
> 	trace_rpc_socket_connect(xprt, sock, 0);
> 	status = 0;
> out:
> -	xprt_unlock_connect(xprt, transport);
> 	xprt_clear_connecting(xprt);
> +	xprt_unlock_connect(xprt, transport);
> 	xprt_wake_pending_tasks(xprt, status);
> }
> 
> @@ -2329,8 +2327,8 @@ static void xs_tcp_setup_socket(struct work_struct *work)
> 	}
> 	status = -EAGAIN;
> out:
> -	xprt_unlock_connect(xprt, transport);
> 	xprt_clear_connecting(xprt);
> +	xprt_unlock_connect(xprt, transport);
> 	xprt_wake_pending_tasks(xprt, status);
> }
> 
> -- 
> 2.19.2
> 

--
Chuck Lever




  reply	other threads:[~2018-12-17 22:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-17 20:05 [PATCH] SUNRPC: Fix disconnection races Trond Myklebust
2018-12-17 22:06 ` Chuck Lever [this message]
2018-12-17 22:24   ` Trond Myklebust

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1D3503CB-1B9A-459B-980B-A71D0191CFA9@oracle.com \
    --to=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=dwysocha@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=smayhew@redhat.com \
    --cc=trondmy@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).