From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6B49ECE587 for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 17:50:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6C7F215EA for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 17:50:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730253AbfJARud (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Oct 2019 13:50:33 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:60040 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725844AbfJARuc (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Oct 2019 13:50:32 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62ED3316D8C4; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 17:50:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pick.fieldses.org (ovpn-117-193.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.117.193]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11F1860619; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 17:50:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pick.fieldses.org (Postfix, from userid 2815) id 2F0B412017D; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 13:50:31 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2019 13:50:31 -0400 From: "J. Bruce Fields" To: Olga Kornievskaia Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" , linux-nfs , Trond Myklebust , Anna Schumaker Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/19] client and server support for "inter" SSC copy Message-ID: <20191001175031.GA3099@pick.fieldses.org> References: <20190916211353.18802-1-olga.kornievskaia@gmail.com> <20191001171355.GA2372@fieldses.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.41]); Tue, 01 Oct 2019 17:50:32 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 01:47:22PM -0400, Olga Kornievskaia wrote: > On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 1:13 PM J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 03:06:11PM -0400, Olga Kornievskaia wrote: > > > Have you had a chance to take a look at the new patch series and have > > > any more comments? > > > > Honestly, last time I checked I was having trouble finding things to > > complain about--it looked OK to me. > > > > But I'm not sure I understood the management of copy id's, should I > > should give it one more read. And then agree on how to merge it. > > Let me know what you would like to discuss about how copy ids are > managed on the server. I thought that cover letter plus commit > descriptions talk about how copy stateids and copy_notify states are > managed. Do you want me to cut and paste that together here? Yes I did > skip putting the same summary in v7 as I did in earlier submissions. You did fine, I just need to read it carefully and make sure I understand. > > I was thinking maybe you could give us a git branch based on 5.5-rc1 or > > 5.5-rc2, Trond (I think it's Trond this time?) could pull the client > > ones into his tree, and I could pull the rest into mine. > > I do have git space on linux-nfs so I could put my patches there. > However, I'm confused about the ask to be based on 5.5-rc1 as we are > still on 5.4-rc. Whoops, sorry, just a typo, I meant 5.4-rc. --b.