linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: trondmy@kernel.org
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 21/22] NFS: Reduce number of RPC calls when doing uncached readdir
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 16:37:40 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201110213741.860745-22-trondmy@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201110213741.860745-21-trondmy@kernel.org>

From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

If we're doing uncached readdir, allocate multiple pages in order to
try to avoid duplicate RPC calls for the same getdents() call.

Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
---
 fs/nfs/dir.c | 105 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/dir.c b/fs/nfs/dir.c
index b6c3501e8f61..93c6f22cdc62 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/dir.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/dir.c
@@ -199,6 +199,23 @@ void nfs_readdir_clear_array(struct page *page)
 	kunmap_atomic(array);
 }
 
+static struct page *
+nfs_readdir_page_array_alloc(u64 last_cookie, gfp_t gfp_flags)
+{
+	struct page *page = alloc_page(gfp_flags);
+	if (page)
+		nfs_readdir_page_init_array(page, last_cookie);
+	return page;
+}
+
+static void nfs_readdir_page_array_free(struct page *page)
+{
+	if (page) {
+		nfs_readdir_clear_array(page);
+		put_page(page);
+	}
+}
+
 static void nfs_readdir_array_set_eof(struct nfs_cache_array *array)
 {
 	array->page_is_eof = 1;
@@ -694,12 +711,14 @@ void nfs_prime_dcache(struct dentry *parent, struct nfs_entry *entry,
 static int nfs_readdir_page_filler(struct nfs_readdir_descriptor *desc,
 				   struct nfs_entry *entry,
 				   struct page **xdr_pages,
-				   struct page *fillme, unsigned int buflen)
+				   unsigned int buflen,
+				   struct page **arrays,
+				   size_t narrays)
 {
 	struct address_space *mapping = desc->file->f_mapping;
 	struct xdr_stream stream;
 	struct xdr_buf buf;
-	struct page *scratch, *new, *page = fillme;
+	struct page *scratch, *new, *page = *arrays;
 	int status;
 
 	scratch = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -725,15 +744,25 @@ static int nfs_readdir_page_filler(struct nfs_readdir_descriptor *desc,
 		if (status != -ENOSPC)
 			continue;
 
-		if (page->mapping != mapping)
-			break;
-		new = nfs_readdir_page_get_next(mapping, page->index + 1,
-						entry->prev_cookie);
-		if (!new)
-			break;
-		if (page != fillme)
-			nfs_readdir_page_unlock_and_put(page);
-		page = new;
+		if (page->mapping != mapping) {
+			if (!--narrays)
+				break;
+			new = nfs_readdir_page_array_alloc(entry->prev_cookie,
+							   GFP_KERNEL);
+			if (!new)
+				break;
+			arrays++;
+			*arrays = page = new;
+		} else {
+			new = nfs_readdir_page_get_next(mapping,
+							page->index + 1,
+							entry->prev_cookie);
+			if (!new)
+				break;
+			if (page != *arrays)
+				nfs_readdir_page_unlock_and_put(page);
+			page = new;
+		}
 		status = nfs_readdir_add_to_array(entry, page);
 	} while (!status && !entry->eof);
 
@@ -750,7 +779,7 @@ static int nfs_readdir_page_filler(struct nfs_readdir_descriptor *desc,
 		break;
 	}
 
-	if (page != fillme)
+	if (page != *arrays)
 		nfs_readdir_page_unlock_and_put(page);
 
 	put_page(scratch);
@@ -790,10 +819,11 @@ static struct page **nfs_readdir_alloc_pages(size_t npages)
 }
 
 static int nfs_readdir_xdr_to_array(struct nfs_readdir_descriptor *desc,
-				    struct page *page, __be32 *verf_arg,
-				    __be32 *verf_res)
+				    __be32 *verf_arg, __be32 *verf_res,
+				    struct page **arrays, size_t narrays)
 {
 	struct page **pages;
+	struct page *page = *arrays;
 	struct nfs_entry *entry;
 	size_t array_size;
 	struct inode *inode = file_inode(desc->file);
@@ -835,7 +865,8 @@ static int nfs_readdir_xdr_to_array(struct nfs_readdir_descriptor *desc,
 			break;
 		}
 
-		status = nfs_readdir_page_filler(desc, entry, pages, page, pglen);
+		status = nfs_readdir_page_filler(desc, entry, pages, pglen,
+						 arrays, narrays);
 	} while (!status && nfs_readdir_page_needs_filling(page));
 
 	nfs_readdir_free_pages(pages, array_size);
@@ -884,8 +915,8 @@ static int find_and_lock_cache_page(struct nfs_readdir_descriptor *desc)
 	if (!desc->page)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	if (nfs_readdir_page_needs_filling(desc->page)) {
-		res = nfs_readdir_xdr_to_array(desc, desc->page,
-					       nfsi->cookieverf, verf);
+		res = nfs_readdir_xdr_to_array(desc, nfsi->cookieverf, verf,
+					       &desc->page, 1);
 		if (res < 0) {
 			nfs_readdir_page_unlock_and_put_cached(desc);
 			if (res == -EBADCOOKIE || res == -ENOTSYNC) {
@@ -976,37 +1007,39 @@ static void nfs_do_filldir(struct nfs_readdir_descriptor *desc)
  */
 static int uncached_readdir(struct nfs_readdir_descriptor *desc)
 {
-	struct page	*page = NULL;
+	struct page	**arrays;
+	size_t		i, sz = 512;
 	__be32		verf[NFS_DIR_VERIFIER_SIZE];
-	int		status;
+	int		status = -ENOMEM;
 
-	dfprintk(DIRCACHE, "NFS: uncached_readdir() searching for cookie %Lu\n",
+	dfprintk(DIRCACHE, "NFS: uncached_readdir() searching for cookie %llu\n",
 			(unsigned long long)desc->dir_cookie);
 
-	page = alloc_page(GFP_HIGHUSER);
-	if (!page) {
-		status = -ENOMEM;
+	arrays = kcalloc(sz, sizeof(*arrays), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!arrays)
+		goto out;
+	arrays[0] = nfs_readdir_page_array_alloc(desc->dir_cookie, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!arrays[0])
 		goto out;
-	}
 
 	desc->page_index = 0;
 	desc->last_cookie = desc->dir_cookie;
-	desc->page = page;
 	desc->duped = 0;
 
-	nfs_readdir_page_init_array(page, desc->dir_cookie);
-	status = nfs_readdir_xdr_to_array(desc, page, desc->verf, verf);
-	if (status < 0)
-		goto out_release;
+	status = nfs_readdir_xdr_to_array(desc, desc->verf, verf, arrays, sz);
 
-	nfs_do_filldir(desc);
+	for (i = 0; !desc->eof && i < sz && arrays[i]; i++) {
+		desc->page = arrays[i];
+		nfs_do_filldir(desc);
+	}
+	desc->page = NULL;
 
- out_release:
-	nfs_readdir_clear_array(desc->page);
-	nfs_readdir_page_put(desc);
- out:
-	dfprintk(DIRCACHE, "NFS: %s: returns %d\n",
-			__func__, status);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < sz && arrays[i]; i++)
+		nfs_readdir_page_array_free(arrays[i]);
+out:
+	kfree(arrays);
+	dfprintk(DIRCACHE, "NFS: %s: returns %d\n", __func__, status);
 	return status;
 }
 
-- 
2.28.0


  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-10 21:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-10 21:37 [PATCH v5 00/22] Readdir enhancements trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37 ` [PATCH v5 01/22] NFS: Remove unnecessary inode locking in nfs_llseek_dir() trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37   ` [PATCH v5 02/22] NFS: Remove unnecessary inode lock in nfs_fsync_dir() trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37     ` [PATCH v5 03/22] NFSv4.2: condition READDIR's mask for security label based on LSM state trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37       ` [PATCH v5 04/22] NFS: Ensure contents of struct nfs_open_dir_context are consistent trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37         ` [PATCH v5 05/22] NFS: Clean up readdir struct nfs_cache_array trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37           ` [PATCH v5 06/22] NFS: Clean up nfs_readdir_page_filler() trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37             ` [PATCH v5 07/22] NFS: Clean up directory array handling trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37               ` [PATCH v5 08/22] NFS: Don't discard readdir results trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37                 ` [PATCH v5 09/22] NFS: Remove unnecessary kmap in nfs_readdir_xdr_to_array() trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37                   ` [PATCH v5 10/22] NFS: Replace kmap() with kmap_atomic() in nfs_readdir_search_array() trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37                     ` [PATCH v5 11/22] NFS: Simplify struct nfs_cache_array_entry trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37                       ` [PATCH v5 12/22] NFS: Support larger readdir buffers trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37                         ` [PATCH v5 13/22] NFS: More readdir cleanups trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37                           ` [PATCH v5 14/22] NFS: nfs_do_filldir() does not return a value trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37                             ` [PATCH v5 15/22] NFS: Reduce readdir stack usage trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37                               ` [PATCH v5 16/22] NFS: Cleanup to remove nfs_readdir_descriptor_t typedef trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37                                 ` [PATCH v5 17/22] NFS: Allow the NFS generic code to pass in a verifier to readdir trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37                                   ` [PATCH v5 18/22] NFS: Handle NFS4ERR_NOT_SAME and NFSERR_BADCOOKIE from readdir calls trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37                                     ` [PATCH v5 19/22] NFS: Improve handling of directory verifiers trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37                                       ` [PATCH v5 20/22] NFS: Optimisations for monotonically increasing readdir cookies trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37                                         ` trondmy [this message]
2020-11-10 21:37                                           ` [PATCH v5 22/22] NFS: Do uncached readdir when we're seeking a cookie in an empty page cache trondmy
2020-11-11 22:15 ` [PATCH v5 00/22] Readdir enhancements David Wysochanski
2020-11-12 11:41   ` David Wysochanski
2020-11-12 15:34     ` Guy Keren
2020-11-12 16:54       ` Trond Myklebust
2020-11-12 16:51     ` Trond Myklebust
2020-11-12 18:26       ` Trond Myklebust
2020-11-12 18:39         ` Benjamin Coddington
2020-11-12 18:49           ` Benjamin Coddington
2020-11-12 19:04           ` Trond Myklebust
2020-11-12 19:09             ` Benjamin Coddington
2020-11-12 20:23               ` Benjamin Coddington
2020-11-13 11:09                 ` Mkrtchyan, Tigran
2020-11-14 13:32         ` David Wysochanski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201110213741.860745-22-trondmy@kernel.org \
    --to=trondmy@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).