linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com>
To: "dai.ngo@oracle.com" <dai.ngo@oracle.com>,
	"linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	"anna.schumaker@netapp.com" <anna.schumaker@netapp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] nfs: optimise readdir cache page invalidation
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 00:10:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5d9ccb1b287760cc11798bef496510b9cf8aee75.camel@hammerspace.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200122234853.101576-1-dai.ngo@oracle.com>

On Wed, 2020-01-22 at 18:48 -0500, Dai Ngo wrote:
> When the directory is large and it's being modified by one client
> while another client is doing the 'ls -l' on the same directory then
> the cache page invalidation from nfs_force_use_readdirplus causes
> the reading client to keep restarting READDIRPLUS from cookie 0
> which causes the 'ls -l' to take a very long time to complete,
> possibly never completing.
> 
> Currently when nfs_force_use_readdirplus is called to switch from
> READDIR to READDIRPLUS, it invalidates all the cached pages of the
> directory. This cache page invalidation causes the next nfs_readdir
> to re-read the directory content from cookie 0.
> 
> This patch is to optimise the cache invalidation in
> nfs_force_use_readdirplus by only truncating the cached pages from
> last page index accessed to the end the file. It also marks the
> inode to delay invalidating all the cached page of the directory
> until the next initial nfs_readdir of the next 'ls' instance.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com>
> 
> ---
>  fs/nfs/dir.c           | 14 +++++++++++++-
>  include/linux/nfs_fs.h |  3 +++
>  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/dir.c b/fs/nfs/dir.c
> index e180033e35cf..3fbf2e41d523 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/dir.c
> @@ -437,7 +437,10 @@ void nfs_force_use_readdirplus(struct inode
> *dir)
>  	if (nfs_server_capable(dir, NFS_CAP_READDIRPLUS) &&
>  	    !list_empty(&nfsi->open_files)) {
>  		set_bit(NFS_INO_ADVISE_RDPLUS, &nfsi->flags);
> -		invalidate_mapping_pages(dir->i_mapping, 0, -1);
> +		nfs_zap_mapping(dir, dir->i_mapping);
> +		if (NFS_PROTO(dir)->version == 3)
> +			invalidate_mapping_pages(dir->i_mapping,
> +				nfsi->page_index + 1, -1);

Let's do this for NFSv4 as well. The motivation is the same: to allow
us to replace a series of GETATTR calls to one or more READDIRPLUS
calls.

>  	}
>  }
>  
> @@ -709,6 +712,9 @@ struct page
> *get_cache_page(nfs_readdir_descriptor_t *desc)
>  int find_cache_page(nfs_readdir_descriptor_t *desc)
>  {
>  	int res;
> +	struct inode *inode;
> +	struct nfs_inode *nfsi;
> +	struct dentry *dentry;
>  
>  	desc->page = get_cache_page(desc);
>  	if (IS_ERR(desc->page))
> @@ -717,6 +723,12 @@ int find_cache_page(nfs_readdir_descriptor_t
> *desc)
>  	res = nfs_readdir_search_array(desc);
>  	if (res != 0)
>  		cache_page_release(desc);
> +
> +	dentry = file_dentry(desc->file);
> +	inode = d_inode(dentry);
> +	nfsi = NFS_I(inode);
> +	nfsi->page_index = desc->page_index;
> +
>  	return res;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/include/linux/nfs_fs.h b/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
> index c06b1fd130f3..a5f8f03ecd59 100644
> --- a/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
> @@ -168,6 +168,9 @@ struct nfs_inode {
>  	struct rw_semaphore	rmdir_sem;
>  	struct mutex		commit_mutex;
>  
> +	/* track last access to cached pages */
> +	unsigned long		page_index;
> +
>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NFS_V4)
>  	struct nfs4_cached_acl	*nfs4_acl;
>          /* NFSv4 state */

Otherwise, the patch looks good to me.

-- 
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer, Hammerspace
trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com



  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-23  0:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-22 23:48 [PATCH RFC] nfs: optimise readdir cache page invalidation Dai Ngo
2020-01-23  0:10 ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2020-01-23 18:35 ` Trond Myklebust
2020-01-23 18:37   ` Trond Myklebust
2020-01-23 18:55     ` Schumaker, Anna

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5d9ccb1b287760cc11798bef496510b9cf8aee75.camel@hammerspace.com \
    --to=trondmy@hammerspace.com \
    --cc=anna.schumaker@netapp.com \
    --cc=dai.ngo@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).