From: Steve Dickson <SteveD@RedHat.com>
To: "Jianhong.Yin" <yin-jianhong@163.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, jiyin@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mount.nfs: fix ignore EBUSY problem in special scenario
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 13:00:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <813b5167-8c4a-dd64-eb95-d29b4463d54a@RedHat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190228050842.15827-1-yin-jianhong@163.com>
Hello,
I apologies for taking so long to get to this...
On 2/28/19 12:08 AM, Jianhong.Yin wrote:
> now mount.nfs ignore EBUSY when the $dir is a mountpoint,
> it's not correct in specail scenario for example:
> $dir is a mountpoint of other filesystem(let's say tmpfs)
> so we must be sure: current nfs mounting has mounted on $dir, then
> ignore the EBUSY for user.
>
> - if (errno == EBUSY && is_mountpoint(mi->node))
> + if (errno == EBUSY && is_mountpoint(mi->node) && has_mounted_on(mi->spec, mi->node))
>
> reproducer:
> '''
> mkdir -p /expdir /mnt/nfsmp /mnt/tmpfs
> echo "/expdir *(rw,no_root_squash)" >/etc/exports
> service nfs restart
> mount -t tmpfs tmpfs /mnt/tmpfs
> mount -osharecache localhost:/expdir /mnt/nfsmp #success
> mount -osharecache localhost:/expdir /mnt/nfsmp #mounted already, return 0(pass)
> mount -osharecache localhost:/expdir /mnt/tmpfs #success
> mount -osharecache localhost:/expdir /mnt/tmpfs #mounted already, return 0(pass)
> umount /mnt/nfsmp
> umount /mnt/tmpfs
>
> mount -ocontext=system_u:object_r:xferlog_t:s0,sharecache localhost:/expdir /mnt/nfsmp
> mount -ocontext=system_u:object_r:user_home_dir_t:s0,sharecache localhost:/expdir /mnt/tmpfs
> [[ $? = 0 ]] && echo "***test fail: hasn't mounted, should return fail ***"
>
> umount /mnt/nfsmp
What real world problem is this solving or better yet what real world
situation would something like this be done??
I see this more of a pilot error... no one uses tmpfs to make mount to fail
(or not fail in this case)... It's just not how tmpfs is used.
Plus who uses -ocontext= this way? If some one is that sophisticated to
use mount like that.... and get wrong... they need to be a little
more sophisticated ;-)
Finally, when tmpfs is not in the picture things work as expected....
Maybe I'm missing something... I don't this as a problem or a situation
the people will run into... again... maybe I'm missing something.
steved.
> '''
>
> Signed-off-by: Jianhong Yin <yin-jianhong@163.com>
> ---
> support/include/misc.h | 1 +
> support/misc/mountpoint.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> utils/mount/stropts.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/support/include/misc.h b/support/include/misc.h
> index 06e2a0c..bd02bfc 100644
> --- a/support/include/misc.h
> +++ b/support/include/misc.h
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ char *generic_make_pathname(const char *, const char *);
> _Bool generic_setup_basedir(const char *, const char *, char *, const size_t);
>
> extern int is_mountpoint(char *path);
> +extern int has_mounted_on(const char *fsname, const char *dir);
>
> /* size of the file pointer buffers for rpc procfs files */
> #define RPC_CHAN_BUF_SIZE 32768
> diff --git a/support/misc/mountpoint.c b/support/misc/mountpoint.c
> index 9f9ce44..7f8a89f 100644
> --- a/support/misc/mountpoint.c
> +++ b/support/misc/mountpoint.c
> @@ -3,9 +3,11 @@
> * check if a given path is a mountpoint
> */
>
> +#include <stdio.h>
> #include <string.h>
> -#include "xcommon.h"
> +#include <mntent.h>
> #include <sys/stat.h>
> +#include "xcommon.h"
> #include "misc.h"
>
> int
> @@ -38,3 +40,25 @@ is_mountpoint(char *path)
> free(dotdot);
> return rv;
> }
> +
> +int
> +has_mounted_on(const char *fsname, const char *dir)
> +{
> + struct mntent *ent;
> + FILE *fp;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + fp = setmntent("/proc/mounts", "r");
> + if (fp == NULL) {
> + perror("[unlikely] setmntent(3) fail");
> + exit(1);
> + }
> + while (NULL != (ent = getmntent(fp))) {
> + if (!strcmp(ent->mnt_fsname, fsname) && !strcmp(ent->mnt_dir, dir)) {
> + ret = 1;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + endmntent(fp);
> + return ret;
> +}
> diff --git a/utils/mount/stropts.c b/utils/mount/stropts.c
> index a093926..bffb74a 100644
> --- a/utils/mount/stropts.c
> +++ b/utils/mount/stropts.c
> @@ -1081,7 +1081,7 @@ static int nfsmount_fg(struct nfsmount_info *mi)
> return EX_SUCCESS;
>
> #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wdiscarded-qualifiers"
> - if (errno == EBUSY && is_mountpoint(mi->node)) {
> + if (errno == EBUSY && is_mountpoint(mi->node) && has_mounted_on(mi->spec, mi->node)) {
> #pragma GCC diagnostic warning "-Wdiscarded-qualifiers"
> /*
> * EBUSY can happen when mounting a filesystem that
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-05 18:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-28 5:08 [PATCH] mount.nfs: fix ignore EBUSY problem in special scenario Jianhong.Yin
2019-03-05 18:00 ` Steve Dickson [this message]
2019-03-06 4:36 ` Jianhong Yin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=813b5167-8c4a-dd64-eb95-d29b4463d54a@RedHat.com \
--to=steved@redhat.com \
--cc=jiyin@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yin-jianhong@163.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).