From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
Olga Kornievskaia <olga.kornievskaia@gmail.com>,
Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
overlayfs <linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org>,
ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] vfs: introduce generic_copy_file_range()
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 12:03:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOQ4uxiSjmmm5OBx+K5qff4mtL5jSih71izWGQKjA_WQSLe=AA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181203083416.28978-3-david@fromorbit.com>
On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 10:34 AM Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> wrote:
>
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
>
> Right now if vfs_copy_file_range() does not use any offload
> mechanism, it falls back to calling do_splice_direct(). This fails
> to do basic sanity checks on the files being copied. Before we
> start adding this necessarily functionality to the fallback path,
> separate it out into generic_copy_file_range().
>
> generic_copy_file_range() has the same prototype as
> ->copy_file_range() so that filesystems can use it in their custom
> ->copy_file_range() method if they so choose.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> ---
Looks good.
Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Question:
2 years ago you suggested that I covert the overlayfs copy up
code that does a do_direct_splice() with a loop of vfs_copy_file_range():
https://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=147369468521525&w=2
We ended up with a slightly different solution, but with your recent
changes, I can get back to your original proposal.
Back then, I wondered whether it makes sense to push the killable
loop of shorter do_direct_splice() calls into the vfs helper.
What do you think about adding this to generic_copy_file_range()
now? (I can do that after your changes are merged).
The fact that userspace *can* enter a very long unkillable loop
with current copy_file_range() syscall doesn't mean that we
*should* persist this situation. After all, fixing the brokenness
of the existing interface is what you set out to do.
With that change in place, overlayfs could call only
vfs_copy_file_range() as you suggested and not as a fallback to
do_clone_file_range().
Thanks,
Amir.
> fs/read_write.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> include/linux/fs.h | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/read_write.c b/fs/read_write.c
> index 09d1816cf3cf..50114694c98b 100644
> --- a/fs/read_write.c
> +++ b/fs/read_write.c
> @@ -1540,6 +1540,36 @@ COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE4(sendfile64, int, out_fd, int, in_fd,
> }
> #endif
>
> +/**
> + * generic_copy_file_range - copy data between two files
> + * @file_in: file structure to read from
> + * @pos_in: file offset to read from
> + * @file_out: file structure to write data to
> + * @pos_out: file offset to write data to
> + * @len: amount of data to copy
> + * @flags: copy flags
> + *
> + * This is a generic filesystem helper to copy data from one file to another.
> + * It has no constraints on the source or destination file owners - the files
> + * can belong to different superblocks and different filesystem types. Short
> + * copies are allowed.
> + *
> + * This should be called from the @file_out filesystem, as per the
> + * ->copy_file_range() method.
> + *
> + * Returns the number of bytes copied or a negative error indicating the
> + * failure.
> + */
> +
> +ssize_t generic_copy_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
> + struct file *file_out, loff_t pos_out,
> + size_t len, unsigned int flags)
> +{
> + return do_splice_direct(file_in, &pos_in, file_out, &pos_out,
> + len > MAX_RW_COUNT ? MAX_RW_COUNT : len, 0);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(generic_copy_file_range);
> +
> /*
> * copy_file_range() differs from regular file read and write in that it
> * specifically allows return partial success. When it does so is up to
> @@ -1611,9 +1641,8 @@ ssize_t vfs_copy_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
> goto done;
> }
>
> - ret = do_splice_direct(file_in, &pos_in, file_out, &pos_out,
> - len > MAX_RW_COUNT ? MAX_RW_COUNT : len, 0);
> -
> + ret = generic_copy_file_range(file_in, &pos_in, file_out, &pos_out,
> + len, flags);
> done:
> if (ret > 0) {
> fsnotify_access(file_in);
> diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> index c95c0807471f..a4478764cf63 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -1874,6 +1874,9 @@ extern ssize_t vfs_readv(struct file *, const struct iovec __user *,
> unsigned long, loff_t *, rwf_t);
> extern ssize_t vfs_copy_file_range(struct file *, loff_t , struct file *,
> loff_t, size_t, unsigned int);
> +extern ssize_t generic_copy_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
> + struct file *file_out, loff_t pos_out,
> + size_t len, unsigned int flags);
> extern int generic_remap_file_range_prep(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
> struct file *file_out, loff_t pos_out,
> loff_t *count,
> --
> 2.19.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-03 10:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-03 8:34 [PATCH 0/11] fs: fixes for major copy_file_range() issues Dave Chinner
2018-12-03 8:34 ` [PATCH 01/11] vfs: copy_file_range source range over EOF should fail Dave Chinner
2018-12-03 12:46 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-12-04 15:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-04 21:29 ` Dave Chinner
2018-12-04 21:47 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2018-12-04 22:31 ` Dave Chinner
2018-12-05 16:51 ` J. Bruce Fields
2019-05-20 9:10 ` Amir Goldstein
2019-05-20 13:12 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2019-05-20 13:36 ` Amir Goldstein
2019-05-20 13:58 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2019-05-20 14:02 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-12-05 14:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-05 21:08 ` Dave Chinner
2018-12-05 21:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-03 8:34 ` [PATCH 02/11] vfs: introduce generic_copy_file_range() Dave Chinner
2018-12-03 10:03 ` Amir Goldstein [this message]
2018-12-03 23:00 ` Dave Chinner
2018-12-04 15:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-03 8:34 ` [PATCH 03/11] vfs: no fallback for ->copy_file_range Dave Chinner
2018-12-03 10:22 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-12-03 23:02 ` Dave Chinner
2018-12-06 4:16 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-12-06 21:30 ` Dave Chinner
2018-12-07 5:38 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-12-03 18:23 ` Anna Schumaker
2018-12-04 15:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-03 8:34 ` [PATCH 04/11] vfs: add missing checks to copy_file_range Dave Chinner
2018-12-03 12:42 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-12-03 19:04 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-12-03 21:33 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2018-12-03 23:04 ` Dave Chinner
2018-12-04 15:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-12 11:31 ` Luis Henriques
2018-12-12 16:42 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-12-12 18:55 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2018-12-12 19:42 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-12-12 20:22 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2018-12-13 10:29 ` Luis Henriques
2018-12-03 8:34 ` [PATCH 05/11] vfs: use inode_permission in copy_file_range() Dave Chinner
2018-12-03 12:47 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-12-03 18:18 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-12-03 23:55 ` Dave Chinner
2018-12-05 17:28 ` J. Bruce Fields
2018-12-03 18:53 ` Eric Biggers
2018-12-04 15:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-03 8:34 ` [PATCH 06/11] vfs: copy_file_range needs to strip setuid bits Dave Chinner
2018-12-03 12:51 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-12-04 15:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-03 8:34 ` [PATCH 07/11] vfs: copy_file_range should update file timestamps Dave Chinner
2018-12-03 10:47 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-12-03 17:33 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2018-12-03 18:22 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-12-03 23:19 ` Dave Chinner
2018-12-04 15:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-03 8:34 ` [PATCH 08/11] vfs: push EXDEV check down into ->remap_file_range Dave Chinner
2018-12-03 11:04 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-12-03 19:11 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-12-03 23:37 ` Dave Chinner
2018-12-03 23:58 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-12-04 9:17 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-12-03 23:34 ` Dave Chinner
2018-12-03 18:24 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-12-04 8:18 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2018-12-03 8:34 ` [PATCH 09/11] vfs: push copy_file_ranges -EXDEV checks down Dave Chinner
2018-12-03 12:36 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-12-03 17:58 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2018-12-03 18:53 ` Anna Schumaker
2018-12-03 19:27 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2018-12-03 23:40 ` Dave Chinner
2018-12-04 15:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-04 22:18 ` Dave Chinner
2018-12-04 23:33 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2018-12-05 14:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-05 17:01 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2018-12-03 8:34 ` [PATCH 10/11] vfs: allow generic_copy_file_range to copy across devices Dave Chinner
2018-12-03 12:54 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-12-03 8:34 ` [PATCH 11/11] ovl: allow cross-device copy_file_range calls Dave Chinner
2018-12-03 12:55 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-12-03 8:39 ` [PATCH 12/11] man-pages: copy_file_range updates Dave Chinner
2018-12-03 13:05 ` Amir Goldstein
2019-05-21 5:52 ` Amir Goldstein
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAOQ4uxiSjmmm5OBx+K5qff4mtL5jSih71izWGQKjA_WQSLe=AA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=olga.kornievskaia@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).