From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] libnvdimm: Update the meaning for persistence_domain values
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 23:25:57 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3184f0f6-1dc7-28b8-0b29-b2b9afa490d3@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <x49k15soc5v.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
On 1/15/20 11:05 PM, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> writes:
>
>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/libnvdimm.h b/include/linux/libnvdimm.h
>>>> index f2a33f2e3ba8..9126737377e1 100644
>>>> --- a/include/linux/libnvdimm.h
>>>> +++ b/include/linux/libnvdimm.h
>>>> @@ -52,9 +52,9 @@ enum {
>>>> */
>>>> ND_REGION_PERSIST_CACHE = 1,
>>>> /*
>>>> - * Platform provides mechanisms to automatically flush outstanding
>>>> - * write data from memory controler to pmem on system power loss.
>>>> - * (ADR)
>>>> + * Platform provides instructions to flush data such that on completion
>>>> + * of the instructions, data flushed is guaranteed to be on pmem even
>>>> + * in case of a system power loss.
>>>
>>> I find the prior description easier to understand.
>>
>> I was trying to avoid the term 'automatically, 'memory controler' and
>> ADR. Can I update the above as
>
> I can understand avoiding the very x86-specific "ADR," but is memory
> controller not accurate for your platform?
>
>> /*
>> * Platform provides mechanisms to flush outstanding write data
>> * to pmem on system power loss.
>> */
>
> That's way too broad. :) The comments are describing the persistence
> domain. i.e. if you get data to $HERE, it is guaranteed to make it out
> to stable media.
With technologies like OpenCAPI, we possibly may not want to call them
"memory controller"? In a way platform mechanism will flush them such
that on power failure, it is guaranteed to be on the pmem media. But
should we call these boundary "memory_controller"? May be we can
consider "memory controller" an overloaded term there. Considering we
are calling this as memory_controller for application to parse via
sysfs, may be the documentation can also carry the same term.
-aneesh
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nvdimm-leave@lists.01.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-15 17:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-08 6:49 [RFC PATCH] libnvdimm: Update the meaning for persistence_domain values Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-01-15 16:55 ` Jeff Moyer
2020-01-15 17:27 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-01-15 17:31 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-01-15 17:42 ` Jeff Moyer
2020-01-15 19:44 ` Dan Williams
2020-01-15 17:35 ` Jeff Moyer
2020-01-15 17:55 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2020-01-15 19:48 ` Dan Williams
2020-01-16 6:24 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3184f0f6-1dc7-28b8-0b29-b2b9afa490d3@linux.ibm.com \
--to=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).