From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: "linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/12] PM, libnvdimm: Add syscore_quiesced() callback for firmware activation
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 16:23:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gL66d7fo8nmKFUm6dSBe8bSRymcOfW9YeePUJ9U=3p-g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <159312907937.1850128.15890323251117466770.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 2:07 AM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
>
> The runtime firmware activation capability of Intel NVDIMM devices
> requires memory transactions to be disabled for 100s of microseconds.
> This timeout is large enough to cause in-flight DMA to fail and other
> application detectable timeouts. Arrange for firmware activation to be
> executed while the system is "quiesced" all suspend operations have
> completed successfully.
>
> Note that the placement of syscore_quiesced() before
> suspend_disable_secondary_cpus() and the "TEST_PLATFORM" early exit in
> suspend_enter():
>
> if (suspend_test(TEST_PLATFORM))
> goto Platform_wake;
>
> ...is a deliberate tradeoff. suspend_disable_secondary_cpus() causes
> violence to drivers with many interrupts allocated (server-class network
> adapters for example). So, allow for triggering firmware-activation
> without requiring all irq vectors to be routed (oversubscribed) to a
> single CPU.
So while the other patches in the series look good to me, this is kind
of questionable for reasons described in my reply to the intro
message.
Cheers!
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nvdimm-leave@lists.01.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-26 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-25 23:50 [PATCH 00/12] ACPI/NVDIMM: Runtime Firmware Activation Dan Williams
2020-06-25 23:50 ` [PATCH 01/12] libnvdimm: Validate command family indices Dan Williams
2020-07-01 19:33 ` Sasha Levin
2020-07-10 14:02 ` Sasha Levin
2020-06-25 23:50 ` [PATCH 02/12] ACPI: NFIT: Move bus_dsm_mask out of generic nvdimm_bus_descriptor Dan Williams
2020-06-25 23:50 ` [PATCH 03/12] ACPI: NFIT: Define runtime firmware activation commands Dan Williams
2020-06-25 23:50 ` [PATCH 04/12] tools/testing/nvdimm: Cleanup dimm index passing Dan Williams
2020-06-25 23:50 ` [PATCH 05/12] tools/testing/nvdimm: Add command debug messages Dan Williams
2020-06-25 23:50 ` [PATCH 06/12] tools/testing/nvdimm: Prepare nfit_ctl_test() for ND_CMD_CALL emulation Dan Williams
2020-06-25 23:50 ` [PATCH 07/12] tools/testing/nvdimm: Emulate firmware activation commands Dan Williams
2020-06-25 23:51 ` [PATCH 08/12] driver-core: Introduce DEVICE_ATTR_ADMIN_{RO,RW} Dan Williams
2020-06-26 5:06 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-06-26 5:09 ` Dan Williams
2020-06-25 23:51 ` [PATCH 09/12] libnvdimm: Convert to DEVICE_ATTR_ADMIN_RO() Dan Williams
2020-06-25 23:51 ` [PATCH 10/12] libnvdimm: Add runtime firmware activation sysfs interface Dan Williams
2020-06-25 23:51 ` [PATCH 11/12] PM, libnvdimm: Add syscore_quiesced() callback for firmware activation Dan Williams
2020-06-26 14:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2020-06-25 23:51 ` [PATCH 12/12] ACPI: NFIT: Add runtime firmware activate support Dan Williams
2020-06-26 14:22 ` [PATCH 00/12] ACPI/NVDIMM: Runtime Firmware Activation Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-26 18:43 ` Dan Williams
2020-06-28 17:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-29 23:37 ` Dan Williams
2020-06-30 10:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJZ5v0gL66d7fo8nmKFUm6dSBe8bSRymcOfW9YeePUJ9U=3p-g@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).