From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: "Wunderlich, Mark" <mark.wunderlich@intel.com>
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
"linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] nvme-tcp: Initialize sk->sk_ll_usec only with NET_RX_BUSY_POLL
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 19:19:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191010171913.GA3104@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B33B37937B7F3D4CB878107E305D4916D48CFD@ORSMSX104.amr.corp.intel.com>
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 05:08:27PM +0000, Wunderlich, Mark wrote:
> Should there also be a check here to honor any non-zero value of sk_ll_usec ( via sysctl_net_busy_read ), before setting here to hard coded default of 1?
> Or maybe best to have this as a separate patch to consider?
Let's keep that separate. If you want to enhance that area, we probably
shouldn't build nvme_tcp_poll at all without CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL as
well.
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvme mailing list
Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-10 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-10 15:06 [PATCH] nvme-tcp: Remove access to sk->sk_ll_usec Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-10-10 15:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-10-10 15:10 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-10-10 15:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-10-10 15:29 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-10-10 15:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-10-10 15:34 ` [PATCH v2] nvme-tcp: Initialize sk->sk_ll_usec only with NET_RX_BUSY_POLL Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-10-10 17:08 ` Wunderlich, Mark
2019-10-10 17:19 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2019-10-14 7:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-10-14 15:06 ` Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191010171913.GA3104@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.wunderlich@intel.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).