linux-nvme.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
To: Chao Leng <lengchao@huawei.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
	Chaitanya Kulkarni <Chaitanya.Kulkarni@wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3 rfc] Fix nvme-tcp and nvme-rdma controller reset hangs
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 11:43:59 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6c085430-cc10-a2fd-56ee-a360109c940a@grimberg.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2e391aae-58c7-b8f7-1a9e-d7ad5bb3f8f3@huawei.com>


>>>>> Will it work if nvme mpath used request NOWAIT flag for its 
>>>>> submit_bio()
>>>>> call, and add the bio to the requeue_list if blk_queue_enter() 
>>>>> fails? I
>>>>> think that looks like another way to resolve the deadlock, but we need
>>>>> the block layer to return a failed status to the original caller.
>>
>> Yes, I think BLK_MQ_REQ_NOWAIT makes total sense here.  dm-mpath also
>> uses it for its request allocation for similar reasons.
>>
>>>>
>>>> But who would kick the requeue list? and that would make 
>>>> near-tag-exhaust performance stink...
>>
>> The multipath code would have to kick the list.  We could also try to
>> split into two flags, one that affects blk_queue_enter and one that
>> affects the tag allocation.
>>
>>> moving nvme_start_freeze from nvme_rdma_teardown_io_queues to 
>>> nvme_rdma_configure_io_queues can fix it.
>>> It can also avoid I/O hang long time if reconnection failed.
>>
>> Can you explain how we'd still ensure that no new commands get queued
>> during teardown using that scheme?
> 1. tear down will cancel all inflight requests, and then multipath will 
> clear the path.
> 2. and then we may freeze the controler.
> 3. nvme_ns_head_submit_bio can not find the reconnection controller as 
> valid path, so it is safe.

In non-mpath (which unfortunately is a valid use-case), there is no
failover, and we cannot freeze the queue after we stopped (and/or
started) the queues because then fail_non_ready_command() constantly 
return BLK_STS_RESOURCE (just causing a re-submission over and over
again) and the freeze will never complete (the commands are still
inflight from the queue->g_usage_counter perspective).

So I think we should still start queue freeze before we quiesce
the queues.

I still don't see how the mpath NOWAIT suggestion works either...

_______________________________________________
Linux-nvme mailing list
Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-17 18:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-15 22:27 [PATCH 0/3 rfc] Fix nvme-tcp and nvme-rdma controller reset hangs Sagi Grimberg
2021-03-15 22:27 ` [PATCH 1/3] nvme: introduce nvme_ctrl_is_mpath helper Sagi Grimberg
2021-03-15 22:27 ` [PATCH 2/3] nvme-tcp: fix possible hang when trying to set a live path during I/O Sagi Grimberg
2021-03-15 22:27 ` [PATCH 3/3] nvme-rdma: " Sagi Grimberg
2021-03-16  3:24 ` [PATCH 0/3 rfc] Fix nvme-tcp and nvme-rdma controller reset hangs Chao Leng
2021-03-16  5:04   ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-03-16  6:18     ` Chao Leng
2021-03-16  6:25       ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-03-16 20:07 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-03-16 20:42   ` Keith Busch
2021-03-16 23:51     ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-03-17  2:55       ` Chao Leng
2021-03-17  6:59         ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-17  7:59           ` Chao Leng
2021-03-17 18:43             ` Sagi Grimberg [this message]
2021-03-18  1:51               ` Chao Leng
2021-03-18  4:45                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-18 18:46                 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-03-18 19:16                   ` Keith Busch
2021-03-18 19:31                     ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-03-18 21:52                       ` Keith Busch
2021-03-18 22:45                         ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-03-19 14:05                         ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-19 17:28                           ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-19 19:07                             ` Keith Busch
2021-03-19 19:34                             ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-03-20  6:11                               ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-21  6:49                                 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-03-22  6:34                                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-17  8:16           ` Sagi Grimberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6c085430-cc10-a2fd-56ee-a360109c940a@grimberg.me \
    --to=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=Chaitanya.Kulkarni@wdc.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=lengchao@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).