From: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] blk-mq/nvme: use blk_mq_alloc_request() for NVMe's connect request
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 17:43:52 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bde9741b-ee3d-7ba7-1fe9-04c919960412@grimberg.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191119003437.GA1950@redsun51.ssa.fujisawa.hgst.com>
>> I'm starting to think we maybe need to get the connect out of the block
>> layer execution if its such a big problem... Its a real shame if that is
>> the case...
>
> We still need timeout handling for connect commands, so bypassing the
> block layer will need to figure out some other way to handle that.
Which is why I said it'd be a shame :)
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvme mailing list
Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-19 1:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-15 10:42 [PATCH RFC 0/3] blk-mq/nvme: use blk_mq_alloc_request() for NVMe's connect request Ming Lei
2019-11-15 10:42 ` [PATCH RFC 1/3] block: reuse one scheduler/flush field for private request's data Ming Lei
2019-11-15 10:42 ` [PATCH RFC 2/3] nvme: don't use blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx() for allocating connect request Ming Lei
2019-11-15 10:42 ` [PATCH RFC 3/3] blk-mq: kill blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx() Ming Lei
2019-11-15 22:38 ` [PATCH RFC 0/3] blk-mq/nvme: use blk_mq_alloc_request() for NVMe's connect request Sagi Grimberg
2019-11-16 7:17 ` Ming Lei
2019-11-17 1:24 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-11-17 4:12 ` Ming Lei
2019-11-18 23:27 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-11-19 0:05 ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-11-19 0:34 ` Keith Busch
2019-11-19 1:43 ` Sagi Grimberg [this message]
2019-11-19 2:38 ` Ming Lei
2019-11-19 2:33 ` Ming Lei
2019-11-19 17:56 ` James Smart
2019-11-20 6:35 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bde9741b-ee3d-7ba7-1fe9-04c919960412@grimberg.me \
--to=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=james.smart@broadcom.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).