From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7404CC47423 for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 09:21:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BD3C206FA for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 09:21:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1601630485; bh=x5VTDBtOMTRwW5Sw747OpvTmgVVW1CQQvrNgU0YSFNs=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:List-ID:From; b=VcKiQomfFb4Hek8pUnyuiF5TJGZrVCjLY34xRQjsQ/NliqkzpCyI6Hg+hiU8ZAjTp wrE77XhTcDNGfBUxuAYNwShZkMOYR71egrx3xZ579hGj8NdFrmHiSQtAlGZYndUyuW xbdcp1mgpZdtpzAzURly+htx10j+9lJzjPtLl9RQ= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726090AbgJBJVY (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Oct 2020 05:21:24 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:45512 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726029AbgJBJVY (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Oct 2020 05:21:24 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-f47.google.com (mail-ed1-f47.google.com [209.85.208.47]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6672D20758; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 09:21:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1601630483; bh=x5VTDBtOMTRwW5Sw747OpvTmgVVW1CQQvrNgU0YSFNs=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=VeY56BONbbmm2FmoqnTtM9j0aC5oneFySPSit/aqtF5HMMwkvhw+S8PlR4PjMhBv2 MgJXyVXNGNFs4aKNGCJocT13mZWvA5zI826AjQ6tKa1Sz1szZTnT/oTITNdsgyK177 f9J+EMB3qFETAAOQ4tF6pn5moG9vszHhf+sw5NbM= Received: by mail-ed1-f47.google.com with SMTP id i1so960528edv.2; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 02:21:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533OBpZ92jzDRVb9Xc9F8m9ZDPDBIllMJ/sa9+XqjmJm5/yMMgOh 3wRW8ofpYQYlOblLdPr6RarpdR53ABZRNbUuLOM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy5R7Q+WOsSZvDV+Obr4DkMiRhMPNxAJD8JtEaTr3YODtDYA+A/6b0kb8ZGbmu38wYHJp0uYdwzdG8IbDIrIZ8= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:da16:: with SMTP id r22mr1364149eds.132.1601630481982; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 02:21:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200930234637.7573-1-post@lespocky.de> <20200930234637.7573-4-post@lespocky.de> In-Reply-To: <20200930234637.7573-4-post@lespocky.de> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2020 11:21:10 +0200 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/7] dt-bindings: mfd: Fix schema warnings for pwm-leds To: Alexander Dahl Cc: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Pavel Machek , Dan Murphy , Rob Herring , Alexander Dahl , Peter Ujfalusi , Jacek Anaszewski Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 at 01:51, Alexander Dahl wrote: > > The node names for devices using the pwm-leds driver follow a certain > naming scheme (now). What warning? Please post them here and in every DTS patch. Your schema does not enforce pwmleds node naming (the main node, not children), or at least I could not see it. You change multiple files in your patchset so are you sure that all these are justified by warnings pointed out by schema? Best regards, Krzysztof