Am Freitag, 26. Januar 2018, 23:31:46 schrieb Helge Deller:
> On 25.01.2018 16:36, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> > John David Anglin wrote:
> >> On 2018-01-25 3:59 AM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> >>> [  909.756303] Kernel panic - not syncing: Bad Address (null pointer
> >>> deref?) [  909.756303] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Bad Address
> >>> (null pointer deref?)
> >>> 
> >>> This is actually the second place where it breaks, before that I had the
> >>> same>> 
> >>> with this test (twice):
> >> Would you post the PIM dump of the most recent HPMC in the service
> >> menu?
> > 
> > The service menu does not give any information, as in this older bug:
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/481768
> FWIW, I've tested the testcase from
>  https://bugs.gentoo.org/481768
> on a debian system:
> Linux panama.osuosl.org 4.14.0-2-parisc64-smp #1 SMP Debian 4.14.7-1
> (2017-12-28) parisc64 GNU/Linux gdb was version 7.12-6+b1
> 
> On debian I can not reproduce the crash.
> 
> With this sequence:
> (gdb) break gdb-crash.c:14
> (gdb) run
> (gdb) set tp = {0,0}
> 
> tp isn't initialized yet before you reach line 25, and as such it points to
> random memory. I you try to set tp, it depends on what happens (but agreed,
> it shouldn't crash the kernel).
> 
> The Debian kernel hasn't any additional hppa-specific patches.

I'm using vanilla, so nothing on my side either.

> >> Also needed
> >> is the assembler dump of the routine where the HPMC occurred in your
> >> kernel.  You need the
> >> 64-bit version of objdump for this.
> 
> I wonder why there isn't any kernel backtrace...

This was with "dmesg -n 8". Without it has shown only the "Bad address" and 
"end Kernel panic" lines, which is IMHO bad by itself.

> Does gentoo uses special compiler-optimization flags?

I have none.

> > I have put the kernel on https://opensource.sf-tec.de/c8000-kernel.tar.xz
> 
> I'd suggest you put some debugging code in your kernel, e.g. in
> compat_ptrace_request() in kernel/ptrace.c.
> I think gdb uses PTRACE_POKEDATA to set some userspace memory of a process.
> It's generic code, so I wonder why it should crash on parisc.
> 
> You may look at compat_arch_ptrace() in arch/parisc/kernel/ptrace.c too, but
> it doesn't touch memory as far as I can see...

I will not be able to touch any of this until at least mid of next week. If 
you want to give it a try, check gdb 7.12.1 testsuite. It was one of the first 
tests that hit this.

Eike