From: "™֟☻̭҇ Ѽ ҉ ®" <vtolkm@googlemail.com>
To: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Ilias Apalodimas" <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>,
"Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org>,
"Marek Behún" <marek.behun@nic.cz>,
"Thomas Petazzoni" <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
"Jason Cooper" <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Subject: Re: PCI trouble on mvebu (Turris Omnia)
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 11:18:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0bedff56-cd1d-0507-d9bb-e8f5c86f9509@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877dr9mi0g.fsf@toke.dk>
[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 12195 bytes --]
On 29/10/2020 11:41, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> writes:
>
>> [+cc Pali, Marek, Thomas, Jason]
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 04:40:00PM +0000, ™֟☻̭҇ Ѽ ҉ ® wrote:
>>> On 28/10/2020 16:08, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>>>> Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> writes:
>>>>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 02:36:13PM +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>>>>>> Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> writes:
>>>>>>> Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> writes:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [+cc vtolkm]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 04:43:20PM +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm trying to get a mainline kernel to run on my Turris Omnia, and am
>>>>>>>>> having some trouble getting the PCI bus to work correctly. Specifically,
>>>>>>>>> I'm running a 5.10-rc1 kernel (torvalds/master as of this moment), with
>>>>>>>>> the resource request fix[0] applied on top.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The kernel boots fine, and the patch in [0] makes the PCI devices show
>>>>>>>>> up. But I'm still getting initialisation errors like these:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [ 1.632709] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: error updating (0xe0000004 != 0xffffffff)
>>>>>>>>> [ 1.632714] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: error updating (high 0x000000 != 0xffffffff)
>>>>>>>>> [ 1.632745] pci 0000:02:00.0: BAR 0: error updating (0xe0200004 != 0xffffffff)
>>>>>>>>> [ 1.632750] pci 0000:02:00.0: BAR 0: error updating (high 0x000000 != 0xffffffff)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> and the WiFi drivers fail to initialise with what appears to me to be
>>>>>>>>> errors related to the bus rather than to the drivers themselves:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [ 3.509878] ath: phy0: Mac Chip Rev 0xfffc0.f is not supported by this driver
>>>>>>>>> [ 3.517049] ath: phy0: Unable to initialize hardware; initialization status: -95
>>>>>>>>> [ 3.524473] ath9k 0000:01:00.0: Failed to initialize device
>>>>>>>>> [ 3.530081] ath9k: probe of 0000:01:00.0 failed with error -95
>>>>>>>>> [ 3.536012] ath10k_pci 0000:02:00.0: of_irq_parse_pci: failed with rc=134
>>>>>>>>> [ 3.543049] pci 0000:00:02.0: enabling device (0140 -> 0142)
>>>>>>>>> [ 3.548735] ath10k_pci 0000:02:00.0: can't change power state from D3hot to D0 (config space inaccessible)
>>>>>>>>> [ 3.588592] ath10k_pci 0000:02:00.0: failed to wake up device : -110
>>>>>>>>> [ 3.595098] ath10k_pci: probe of 0000:02:00.0 failed with error -110
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> lspci looks OK, though:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> # lspci
>>>>>>>>> 00:01.0 PCI bridge: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. Device 6820 (rev 04)
>>>>>>>>> 00:02.0 PCI bridge: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. Device 6820 (rev 04)
>>>>>>>>> 00:03.0 PCI bridge: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. Device 6820 (rev 04)
>>>>>>>>> 01:00.0 Network controller: Qualcomm Atheros AR9287 Wireless Network Adapter (PCI-Express) (rev 01)
>>>>>>>>> 02:00.0 Network controller: Qualcomm Atheros QCA986x/988x 802.11ac Wireless Network Adapter (rev ff)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Does anyone have any clue what could be going on here? Is this a bug, or
>>>>>>>>> did I miss something in my config or other initialisation? I've tried
>>>>>>>>> with both the stock u-boot distributed with the board, and with an
>>>>>>>>> upstream u-boot from latest master; doesn't seem to make any different.
>>>>>>>> Can you try turning off CONFIG_PCIEASPM? We had a similar recent
>>>>>>>> report at https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=209833 but I
>>>>>>>> don't think we have a fix yet.
>>>>>>> Yes! Turning that off does indeed help! Thanks a bunch :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You mention that bisecting this would be helpful - I can try that
>>>>>>> tomorrow; any idea when this was last working?
>>>>>> OK, so I tried to bisect this, but, erm, I couldn't find a working
>>>>>> revision to start from? I went all the way back to 4.10 (which is the
>>>>>> first version to include the device tree file for the Omnia), and even
>>>>>> on that, the wireless cards were failing to initialise with ASPM
>>>>>> enabled...
>>>>> I have no personal experience with this device; all I know is that the
>>>>> bugzilla suggests that it worked in v5.4, which isn't much help.
>>>>>
>>>>> Possibly the apparent regression was really a .config change, i.e.,
>>>>> CONFIG_PCIEASPM was disabled in the v5.4 kernel vtolkm@ tested and it
>>>>> "worked" but got enabled later and it started failing?
>>>> Yeah, I suspect so. The OpenWrt config disables CONFIG_PCIEASPM by
>>>> default and only turns it on for specific targets. So I guess that it's
>>>> most likely that this has never worked...
>>>>
>>>>> Maybe the debug patch below would be worth trying to see if it makes
>>>>> any difference? If it *does* help, try omitting the first hunk to see
>>>>> if we just need to apply the quirk_enable_clear_retrain_link() quirk.
>>>> Tried, doesn't help...
>>>>
>>>> -Toke
>>> Found this patch
>>>
>>> https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/blob/7c0496f29bed87326f1bf591ca25ace82373cfc7/target/linux/mvebu/patches-5.4/405-PCI-aardvark-Improve-link-training.patch
>>>
>>> that mentions the Compex WLE900VX card, which reading the lspci verbose
>>> output from the bugtracker seems to the device being troubled.
>> Interesting. Indeed, the Compex WLE900VX card seems to have the
>> Qualcomm Atheros QCA9880 on it, and it looks like Toke's system has
>> the same device in it.
>>
>> The patch you mention (https://git.kernel.org/linus/43fc679ced18) is
>> for aardvark, so of course doesn't help mvebu.
>>
>> PCIe hardware is supposed to automatically negotiate the highest link
>> speed supported by both ends. But software *is* allowed to set an
>> upper limit (the Target Link Speed in Link Control 2). If we initiate
>> a retrain and the link doesn't come back up, I wonder if we should try
>> to help the hardware out by using Target Link Speed to limit to a
>> lower speed and attempting another retrain, something like this hacky
>> patch: (please collect the dmesg log if you try this)
> Well, I tried it, but don't see any of the 'lnkcap2' output from that
> new function:
>
> [ 1.545853] mvebu-pcie soc:pcie: host bridge /soc/pcie ranges:
> [ 1.545878] mvebu-pcie soc:pcie: MEM 0x00f1080000..0x00f1081fff -> 0x0000080000
> [ 1.545894] mvebu-pcie soc:pcie: MEM 0x00f1040000..0x00f1041fff -> 0x0000040000
> [ 1.545907] mvebu-pcie soc:pcie: MEM 0x00f1044000..0x00f1045fff -> 0x0000044000
> [ 1.545920] mvebu-pcie soc:pcie: MEM 0x00f1048000..0x00f1049fff -> 0x0000048000
> [ 1.545933] mvebu-pcie soc:pcie: MEM 0xffffffffffffffff..0x00fffffffe -> 0x0100000000
> [ 1.545945] mvebu-pcie soc:pcie: IO 0xffffffffffffffff..0x00fffffffe -> 0x0100000000
> [ 1.545958] mvebu-pcie soc:pcie: MEM 0xffffffffffffffff..0x00fffffffe -> 0x0200000000
> [ 1.545970] mvebu-pcie soc:pcie: IO 0xffffffffffffffff..0x00fffffffe -> 0x0200000000
> [ 1.545982] mvebu-pcie soc:pcie: MEM 0xffffffffffffffff..0x00fffffffe -> 0x0300000000
> [ 1.545994] mvebu-pcie soc:pcie: IO 0xffffffffffffffff..0x00fffffffe -> 0x0300000000
> [ 1.546006] mvebu-pcie soc:pcie: MEM 0xffffffffffffffff..0x00fffffffe -> 0x0400000000
> [ 1.546014] mvebu-pcie soc:pcie: IO 0xffffffffffffffff..0x00fffffffe -> 0x0400000000
> [ 1.546181] mvebu-pcie soc:pcie: PCI host bridge to bus 0000:00
> [ 1.546190] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [bus 00-ff]
> [ 1.546197] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0xf1080000-0xf1081fff] (bus address [0x00080000-0x00081fff])
> [ 1.546204] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0xf1040000-0xf1041fff] (bus address [0x00040000-0x00041fff])
> [ 1.546210] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0xf1044000-0xf1045fff] (bus address [0x00044000-0x00045fff])
> [ 1.546216] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0xf1048000-0xf1049fff] (bus address [0x00048000-0x00049fff])
> [ 1.546220] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0xe0000000-0xe7ffffff]
> [ 1.546225] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [io 0x1000-0xeffff]
> [ 1.546294] pci 0000:00:01.0: [11ab:6820] type 01 class 0x060400
> [ 1.546308] pci 0000:00:01.0: reg 0x38: [mem 0x00000000-0x000007ff pref]
> [ 1.546482] pci 0000:00:02.0: [11ab:6820] type 01 class 0x060400
> [ 1.546495] pci 0000:00:02.0: reg 0x38: [mem 0x00000000-0x000007ff pref]
> [ 1.546643] pci 0000:00:03.0: [11ab:6820] type 01 class 0x060400
> [ 1.546656] pci 0000:00:03.0: reg 0x38: [mem 0x00000000-0x000007ff pref]
> [ 1.547379] PCI: bus0: Fast back to back transfers disabled
> [ 1.547387] pci 0000:00:01.0: bridge configuration invalid ([bus 00-00]), reconfiguring
> [ 1.547394] pci 0000:00:02.0: bridge configuration invalid ([bus 00-00]), reconfiguring
> [ 1.547402] pci 0000:00:03.0: bridge configuration invalid ([bus 00-00]), reconfiguring
> [ 1.547484] pci 0000:01:00.0: [168c:002e] type 00 class 0x028000
> [ 1.547507] pci 0000:01:00.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0xe8000000-0xe800ffff 64bit]
> [ 1.547615] pci 0000:01:00.0: supports D1
> [ 1.547620] pci 0000:01:00.0: PME# supported from D0 D1 D3hot
> [ 1.547730] pci 0000:00:01.0: ASPM: current common clock configuration is inconsistent, reconfiguring
> [ 1.631937] PCI: bus2: Fast back to back transfers enabled
> [ 1.631945] pci_bus 0000:02: busn_res: [bus 02-ff] end is updated to 02
> [ 1.632655] PCI: bus3: Fast back to back transfers enabled
> [ 1.632662] pci_bus 0000:03: busn_res: [bus 03-ff] end is updated to 03
> [ 1.632694] pci 0000:00:01.0: BAR 8: assigned [mem 0xe0000000-0xe00fffff]
> [ 1.632702] pci 0000:00:02.0: BAR 8: assigned [mem 0xe0200000-0xe04fffff]
> [ 1.632710] pci 0000:00:01.0: BAR 6: assigned [mem 0xe0100000-0xe01007ff pref]
> [ 1.632718] pci 0000:00:02.0: BAR 6: assigned [mem 0xe0500000-0xe05007ff pref]
> [ 1.632726] pci 0000:00:03.0: BAR 6: assigned [mem 0xe0600000-0xe06007ff pref]
> [ 1.632734] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: assigned [mem 0xe0000000-0xe000ffff 64bit]
> [ 1.632741] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: error updating (0xe0000004 != 0xffffffff)
> [ 1.632746] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: error updating (high 0x000000 != 0xffffffff)
> [ 1.632752] pci 0000:00:01.0: PCI bridge to [bus 01]
> [ 1.632760] pci 0000:00:01.0: bridge window [mem 0xe0000000-0xe00fffff]
> [ 1.632769] pci 0000:02:00.0: BAR 0: assigned [mem 0xe0200000-0xe03fffff 64bit]
> [ 1.632776] pci 0000:02:00.0: BAR 0: error updating (0xe0200004 != 0xffffffff)
> [ 1.632782] pci 0000:02:00.0: BAR 0: error updating (high 0x000000 != 0xffffffff)
> [ 1.632788] pci 0000:02:00.0: BAR 6: assigned [mem 0xe0400000-0xe040ffff pref]
> [ 1.632793] pci 0000:00:02.0: PCI bridge to [bus 02]
> [ 1.632800] pci 0000:00:02.0: bridge window [mem 0xe0200000-0xe04fffff]
> [ 1.632807] pci 0000:00:03.0: PCI bridge to [bus 03]
>
> (and then later, still):
> [ 3.476364] pci 0000:00:01.0: enabling device (0140 -> 0142)
> [ 3.477542] ata1: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
> [ 3.482126] ath9k 0000:01:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002)
> [ 3.487487] ata2: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
> [ 3.493379] ath: phy0: Mac Chip Rev 0xfffc0.f is not supported by this driver
> [ 3.505891] ath: phy0: Unable to initialize hardware; initialization status: -95
> [ 3.513325] ath9k 0000:01:00.0: Failed to initialize device
> [ 3.518933] ath9k: probe of 0000:01:00.0 failed with error -95
> [ 3.524862] ath10k_pci 0000:02:00.0: of_irq_parse_pci: failed with rc=134
> [ 3.531904] pci 0000:00:02.0: enabling device (0140 -> 0142)
> [ 3.537590] ath10k_pci 0000:02:00.0: can't change power state from D3hot to D0 (config space inaccessible)
> [ 3.577436] ath10k_pci 0000:02:00.0: failed to wake up device : -110
> [ 3.583948] ath10k_pci: probe of 0000:02:00.0 failed with error -110
>
>
> -Toke
>
Same result my end - run tested with next-20201027
N.B. node does not boot anymore with next-20201028, but that that is
independent of this patch and apparently another issue.
[-- Attachment #1.1.2: OpenPGP_0x729CFF47A416598B.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 3163 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 840 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-29 11:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-27 15:43 PCI trouble on mvebu (Turris Omnia) Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-10-27 17:20 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-10-27 17:44 ` ™֟☻̭҇ Ѽ ҉ ®
2020-10-27 18:59 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-10-27 20:20 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-10-27 21:22 ` ™֟☻̭҇ Ѽ ҉ ®
2020-10-27 21:31 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-10-27 22:01 ` ™֟☻̭҇ Ѽ ҉ ®
2020-10-27 22:12 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-10-27 18:56 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-10-28 13:36 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-10-28 14:42 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-10-28 15:08 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-10-28 16:40 ` ™֟☻̭҇ Ѽ ҉ ®
2020-10-28 23:16 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-10-29 10:09 ` Pali Rohár
2020-10-29 10:56 ` ™֟☻̭҇ Ѽ ҉ ®
2020-10-29 11:12 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-10-29 19:30 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-10-29 19:56 ` ™֟☻̭҇ Ѽ ҉ ®
2020-10-29 19:57 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-10-29 21:55 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2020-10-29 20:18 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-10-29 22:09 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-10-29 20:58 ` Marek Behun
2020-10-30 10:08 ` Pali Rohár
2020-10-30 10:45 ` Marek Behun
2020-10-29 21:54 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2020-10-29 23:15 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-10-30 8:23 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2020-10-30 10:15 ` Pali Rohár
2020-10-29 10:41 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-10-29 11:18 ` ™֟☻̭҇ Ѽ ҉ ® [this message]
2020-10-30 11:23 ` Pali Rohár
2020-10-30 13:02 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-10-30 14:23 ` Pali Rohár
2020-10-30 14:54 ` ™֟☻̭҇ Ѽ ҉ ®
2020-10-31 12:49 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-11-02 15:24 ` Pali Rohár
2020-11-02 15:54 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-11-02 16:18 ` ™֟☻̭҇ Ѽ ҉ ®
2020-11-02 16:33 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-03-15 19:58 ` Pali Rohár
2021-03-16 9:25 ` Pali Rohár
2021-03-18 22:43 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-03-18 23:16 ` Pali Rohár
2021-03-26 12:50 ` Pali Rohár
2021-03-26 15:25 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-03-26 15:34 ` Pali Rohár
2021-03-26 16:54 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-03-26 17:11 ` Pali Rohár
2021-03-26 17:51 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-03-29 17:09 ` Pali Rohár
2021-03-31 14:02 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-03-31 16:15 ` Pali Rohár
2021-03-31 16:53 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-10-29 1:21 ` Marek Behun
2020-10-29 15:12 ` Rob Herring
2020-10-27 18:03 ` Marek Behun
2020-10-27 19:00 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-10-27 20:19 ` Marek Behun
2020-10-27 20:49 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0bedff56-cd1d-0507-d9bb-e8f5c86f9509@gmail.com \
--to=vtolkm@googlemail.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marek.behun@nic.cz \
--cc=pali@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=vtolkm@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).