linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: "Pierre Crégut" <pierre.cregut@orange.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/IOV: update num_VFs earlier
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 17:33:00 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190405223300.GD159318@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190329080058.21736-1-pierre.cregut@orange.com>

On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 09:00:58AM +0100, Pierre Crégut wrote:
> Ensure that iov->num_VFs is set before a netlink message is sent
> when the number of VFs is changed. Only the path for num_VFs > 0
> is affected. The path for num_VFs = 0 is already correct.
> 
> Monitoring programs can relie on netlink messages to track interface
> change and query their state in /sys. But when sriov_numvfs is set to a
> positive value, the netlink message is sent before the value is available
> in sysfs. The value read after the message is received is always zero.

Thanks, Pierre!  Can you clue me in on where exactly the connection
from sriov_enable() to netlink is?

I see one side of the race is with sriov_numvfs_show(), but I don't
know where the netlink message is sent.  Is that connected with the
kobject_uevent(KOBJ_CHANGE)?

One thing this would help with is figuring out exactly how *much*
earlier we need to set iov->num_VFs.  It looks like the current patch
sets it before we actually enable the VFs, so a user could read
/sys/.../sriov_numvfs and get the wrong value.  Of course, that's
unavoidable; the question is whether it's OK to get the new value
*before* it actually takes effect, or whether we want to return a
stale value until after it takes effect.

> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202991
> Signed-off-by: Pierre Crégut <pierre.cregut@orange.com>
> ---
> note: the behaviour can be tested with the following shell script also
> available on the bugzilla (d being the phy device name):
> 
> ip monitor dev $d | grep --line-buffered "^[0-9]*:" | \
> while read line; do cat /sys/class/net/$d/device/sriov_numvfs; done
> 
>  drivers/pci/iov.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/iov.c b/drivers/pci/iov.c
> index 3aa115ed3a65..a9655c10e87f 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/iov.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/iov.c
> @@ -351,6 +351,7 @@ static int sriov_enable(struct pci_dev *dev, int nr_virtfn)
>  		goto err_pcibios;
>  	}
>  
> +	iov->num_VFs = nr_virtfn;
>  	pci_iov_set_numvfs(dev, nr_virtfn);
>  	iov->ctrl |= PCI_SRIOV_CTRL_VFE | PCI_SRIOV_CTRL_MSE;
>  	pci_cfg_access_lock(dev);
> @@ -363,7 +364,6 @@ static int sriov_enable(struct pci_dev *dev, int nr_virtfn)
>  		goto err_pcibios;
>  
>  	kobject_uevent(&dev->dev.kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE);
> -	iov->num_VFs = nr_virtfn;
>  
>  	return 0;
>  
> @@ -379,6 +379,7 @@ static int sriov_enable(struct pci_dev *dev, int nr_virtfn)
>  	if (iov->link != dev->devfn)
>  		sysfs_remove_link(&dev->dev.kobj, "dep_link");
>  
> +	iov->num_VFs = 0;
>  	pci_iov_set_numvfs(dev, 0);
>  	return rc;
>  }
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-05 22:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-29  8:00 [PATCH] PCI/IOV: update num_VFs earlier Pierre Crégut
2019-04-05 22:33 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2019-04-26  8:11   ` CREGUT Pierre IMT/OLN
2019-06-13 23:51     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-10-01 23:45     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-10-03  9:04       ` CREGUT Pierre IMT/OLN
2019-10-03 22:10         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-10-03 22:36           ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-10-03 22:37           ` Duyck, Alexander H
2019-10-08 21:38           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-10-08 22:06             ` Don Dutile
2019-10-09 12:31               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-10-09 14:20                 ` Don Dutile
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-03-25  8:18 Pierre Crégut

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190405223300.GD159318@google.com \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pierre.cregut@orange.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).