linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	Stephen Bates <sbates@raithlin.com>,
	Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 11/28] block: Create blk_segment_split_ctx
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 10:12:23 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190620161240.22738-12-logang@deltatee.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190620161240.22738-1-logang@deltatee.com>

In order to support dma-direct bios, blk_bio_segment_split() will
need to operate on both bio_vecs and dma_vecs. In order to do
this the code inside bio_for_each_bvec() needs to be moved into
a generic helper. Step one to do this is to put some of the
variables used inside the loop into a context structure so we
don't need to pass a dozen variables to this new function.

Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
---
 block/blk-merge.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
index 3581c7ac3c1b..414e61a714bf 100644
--- a/block/blk-merge.c
+++ b/block/blk-merge.c
@@ -201,63 +201,78 @@ static bool bvec_split_segs(struct request_queue *q, struct bio_vec *bv,
 			      sectors, max_segs);
 }
 
+struct blk_segment_split_ctx {
+	unsigned nsegs;
+	unsigned sectors;
+
+	bool prv_valid;
+	struct bio_vec bvprv;
+
+	const unsigned max_sectors;
+	const unsigned max_segs;
+};
+
 static struct bio *blk_bio_segment_split(struct request_queue *q,
 					 struct bio *bio,
 					 struct bio_set *bs,
 					 unsigned *segs)
 {
-	struct bio_vec bv, bvprv, *bvprvp = NULL;
+	struct bio_vec bv;
 	struct bvec_iter iter;
-	unsigned nsegs = 0, sectors = 0;
 	bool do_split = true;
 	struct bio *new = NULL;
-	const unsigned max_sectors = get_max_io_size(q, bio);
-	const unsigned max_segs = queue_max_segments(q);
+
+	struct blk_segment_split_ctx ctx = {
+		.max_sectors = get_max_io_size(q, bio),
+		.max_segs = queue_max_segments(q),
+	};
 
 	bio_for_each_bvec(bv, bio, iter) {
 		/*
 		 * If the queue doesn't support SG gaps and adding this
 		 * offset would create a gap, disallow it.
 		 */
-		if (bvprvp && bvec_gap_to_prev(q, bvprvp, bv.bv_offset))
+		if (ctx.prv_valid && bvec_gap_to_prev(q, &ctx.bvprv,
+						      bv.bv_offset))
 			goto split;
 
-		if (sectors + (bv.bv_len >> 9) > max_sectors) {
+		if (ctx.sectors + (bv.bv_len >> 9) > ctx.max_sectors) {
 			/*
 			 * Consider this a new segment if we're splitting in
 			 * the middle of this vector.
 			 */
-			if (nsegs < max_segs &&
-			    sectors < max_sectors) {
+			if (ctx.nsegs < ctx.max_segs &&
+			    ctx.sectors < ctx.max_sectors) {
 				/* split in the middle of bvec */
-				bv.bv_len = (max_sectors - sectors) << 9;
-				bvec_split_segs(q, &bv, &nsegs,
-						&sectors, max_segs);
+				bv.bv_len =
+					(ctx.max_sectors - ctx.sectors) << 9;
+				bvec_split_segs(q, &bv, &ctx.nsegs,
+						&ctx.sectors, ctx.max_segs);
 			}
 			goto split;
 		}
 
-		if (nsegs == max_segs)
+		if (ctx.nsegs == ctx.max_segs)
 			goto split;
 
-		bvprv = bv;
-		bvprvp = &bvprv;
+		ctx.bvprv = bv;
+		ctx.prv_valid = true;
 
 		if (bv.bv_offset + bv.bv_len <= PAGE_SIZE) {
-			nsegs++;
-			sectors += bv.bv_len >> 9;
-		} else if (bvec_split_segs(q, &bv, &nsegs, &sectors,
-				max_segs)) {
+			ctx.nsegs++;
+			ctx.sectors += bv.bv_len >> 9;
+		} else if (bvec_split_segs(q, &bv, &ctx.nsegs, &ctx.sectors,
+				ctx.max_segs)) {
 			goto split;
 		}
 	}
 
 	do_split = false;
 split:
-	*segs = nsegs;
+	*segs = ctx.nsegs;
 
 	if (do_split) {
-		new = bio_split(bio, sectors, GFP_NOIO, bs);
+		new = bio_split(bio, ctx.sectors, GFP_NOIO, bs);
 		if (new)
 			bio = new;
 	}
-- 
2.20.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-20 16:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-20 16:12 [RFC PATCH 00/28] Removing struct page from P2PDMA Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-20 16:12 ` [RFC PATCH 01/28] block: Introduce DMA direct request type Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-20 16:12 ` [RFC PATCH 02/28] block: Add dma_vec structure Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-20 16:12 ` [RFC PATCH 03/28] block: Warn on mis-use of dma-direct bios Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-20 16:12 ` [RFC PATCH 04/28] block: Never bounce " Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-20 17:23   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-20 18:38     ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-20 16:12 ` [RFC PATCH 05/28] block: Skip dma-direct bios in bio_integrity_prep() Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-20 16:12 ` [RFC PATCH 06/28] block: Support dma-direct bios in bio_advance_iter() Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-20 16:12 ` [RFC PATCH 07/28] block: Use dma_vec length in bio_cur_bytes() for dma-direct bios Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-20 16:12 ` [RFC PATCH 08/28] block: Introduce dmavec_phys_mergeable() Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-20 16:12 ` [RFC PATCH 09/28] block: Introduce vec_gap_to_prev() Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-20 16:12 ` [RFC PATCH 10/28] block: Create generic vec_split_segs() from bvec_split_segs() Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-20 16:12 ` Logan Gunthorpe [this message]
2019-06-20 16:12 ` [RFC PATCH 12/28] block: Create helper for bvec_should_split() Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-20 16:12 ` [RFC PATCH 13/28] block: Generalize bvec_should_split() Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-20 16:12 ` [RFC PATCH 14/28] block: Support splitting dma-direct bios Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-20 16:12 ` [RFC PATCH 15/28] block: Support counting dma-direct bio segments Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-20 16:12 ` [RFC PATCH 16/28] block: Implement mapping dma-direct requests to SGs in blk_rq_map_sg() Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-20 16:12 ` [RFC PATCH 17/28] block: Introduce queue flag to indicate support for dma-direct bios Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-20 16:12 ` [RFC PATCH 18/28] block: Introduce bio_add_dma_addr() Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-20 16:12 ` [RFC PATCH 19/28] nvme-pci: Support dma-direct bios Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-20 16:12 ` [RFC PATCH 20/28] IB/core: Introduce API for initializing a RW ctx from a DMA address Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-20 16:49   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-20 16:59     ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-20 17:11       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-20 18:24         ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-20 16:12 ` [RFC PATCH 21/28] nvmet: Split nvmet_bdev_execute_rw() into a helper function Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-20 16:12 ` [RFC PATCH 22/28] nvmet: Use DMA addresses instead of struct pages for P2P Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-20 16:12 ` [RFC PATCH 23/28] nvme-pci: Remove support for PCI_P2PDMA requests Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-20 16:12 ` [RFC PATCH 24/28] block: Remove PCI_P2PDMA queue flag Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-20 16:12 ` [RFC PATCH 25/28] IB/core: Remove P2PDMA mapping support in rdma_rw_ctx Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-20 16:12 ` [RFC PATCH 26/28] PCI/P2PDMA: Remove SGL helpers Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-20 16:12 ` [RFC PATCH 27/28] PCI/P2PDMA: Remove struct pages that back P2PDMA memory Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-20 16:12 ` [RFC PATCH 28/28] memremap: Remove PCI P2PDMA page memory type Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-20 18:45 ` [RFC PATCH 00/28] Removing struct page from P2PDMA Dan Williams
2019-06-20 19:33   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-20 20:18     ` Dan Williams
2019-06-20 20:51       ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-21 17:47       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-21 17:54         ` Dan Williams
2019-06-24  7:31     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-24 13:46       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-24 13:50         ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-24 13:55           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-24 16:53             ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-24 18:16               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-24 18:28                 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-24 18:54                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-24 19:37                     ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-24 16:10         ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-25  7:18           ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-20 19:34   ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-20 23:40     ` Dan Williams
2019-06-20 23:42       ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-24  7:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-24 16:07   ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-25  7:20     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-25 15:57       ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-25 17:01         ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-25 19:54           ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-26  6:57             ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-26 18:31               ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-26 20:21                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-26 20:39                   ` Dan Williams
2019-06-26 20:54                     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-26 20:55                     ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-26 20:45                   ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-26 21:00                     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-26 21:18                       ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-27  6:32                         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-27 16:09                           ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-27 16:35                             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-27 16:49                               ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-28  4:57                                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-28 16:22                                   ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-28 17:29                                     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-28 18:29                                       ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-28 19:09                                         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-28 19:35                                           ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-07-02 22:45                                             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-02 22:52                                               ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-27  9:08                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-27 16:30                       ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-27 17:00                         ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-27 18:00                           ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-28 13:38                             ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-28 15:54                               ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-06-27  9:01                 ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190620161240.22738-12-logang@deltatee.com \
    --to=logang@deltatee.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=sbates@raithlin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).