From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Cc: Andrew Murray <amurray@thegoodpenguin.co.uk>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: tegra: Print -EPROBE_DEFER error message at debug level
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 14:34:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200323133456.GG3883508@ulmo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200319180529.GB7433@e121166-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4140 bytes --]
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 06:05:30PM +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 02:12:30PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> >
> > Probe deferral is an expected error condition that will usually be
> > recovered from. Print such error messages at debug level to make them
> > available for diagnostic purposes when building with debugging enabled
> > and hide them otherwise to not spam the kernel log with them.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> Hi Thierry,
>
> what tree/branch is it based on ? I assume it may depend on some
> patches queued in one of my branches so please let me know and
> I will apply accordingly.
Hi Lorenzo,
This should apply on top of commit 5b645b7fade9 ("PCI: tegra: Add
support for PCIe endpoint mode in Tegra194") which is currently in
linux-next.
Looking at your "pci" tree, that commit seems to be in a branch
called pci/endpoint, though the equivalent commit there has a slightly
different SHA:
f4746b0ccef9 ("PCI: tegra: Add support for PCIe endpoint mode in Tegra194")
git range-diff shows that the only difference is that in the patch in
linux-next there are a couple of additional exported symbols that are
not in your pci/endpoint branch. That shouldn't be relevant, though,
since this patch touches another area of the code, so applying this to
your pci/endpoint branch should work.
Thierry
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c
> > index 97d3f3db1020..e4870fa6ce9c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c
> > @@ -1159,17 +1159,31 @@ static int tegra_pcie_dw_parse_dt(struct tegra_pcie_dw *pcie)
> > /* Endpoint mode specific DT entries */
> > pcie->pex_rst_gpiod = devm_gpiod_get(pcie->dev, "reset", GPIOD_IN);
> > if (IS_ERR(pcie->pex_rst_gpiod)) {
> > - dev_err(pcie->dev, "Failed to get PERST GPIO: %ld\n",
> > - PTR_ERR(pcie->pex_rst_gpiod));
> > - return PTR_ERR(pcie->pex_rst_gpiod);
> > + int err = PTR_ERR(pcie->pex_rst_gpiod);
> > + const char *level = KERN_ERR;
> > +
> > + if (err == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > + level = KERN_DEBUG;
> > +
> > + dev_printk(level, pcie->dev,
> > + dev_fmt("Failed to get PERST GPIO: %d\n"),
> > + err);
> > + return err;
> > }
> >
> > pcie->pex_refclk_sel_gpiod = devm_gpiod_get(pcie->dev,
> > "nvidia,refclk-select",
> > GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
> > if (IS_ERR(pcie->pex_refclk_sel_gpiod)) {
> > - dev_info(pcie->dev, "Failed to get REFCLK select GPIOs: %ld\n",
> > - PTR_ERR(pcie->pex_refclk_sel_gpiod));
> > + int err = PTR_ERR(pcie->pex_refclk_sel_gpiod);
> > + const char *level = KERN_ERR;
> > +
> > + if (err == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > + level = KERN_DEBUG;
> > +
> > + dev_printk(level, pcie->dev,
> > + dev_fmt("Failed to get REFCLK select GPIOs: %d\n"),
> > + err);
> > pcie->pex_refclk_sel_gpiod = NULL;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -2058,13 +2072,27 @@ static int tegra_pcie_dw_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >
> > ret = tegra_pcie_dw_parse_dt(pcie);
> > if (ret < 0) {
> > - dev_err(dev, "Failed to parse device tree: %d\n", ret);
> > + const char *level = KERN_ERR;
> > +
> > + if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > + level = KERN_DEBUG;
> > +
> > + dev_printk(level, dev,
> > + dev_fmt("Failed to parse device tree: %d\n"),
> > + ret);
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > ret = tegra_pcie_get_slot_regulators(pcie);
> > if (ret < 0) {
> > - dev_err(dev, "Failed to get slot regulators: %d\n", ret);
> > + const char *level = KERN_ERR;
> > +
> > + if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > + level = KERN_DEBUG;
> > +
> > + dev_printk(level, dev,
> > + dev_fmt("Failed to get slot regulators: %d\n"),
> > + ret);
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.24.1
> >
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-23 13:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-19 13:12 [PATCH] PCI: tegra: Print -EPROBE_DEFER error message at debug level Thierry Reding
2020-03-19 17:04 ` Vidya Sagar
2020-03-19 18:05 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-03-23 13:34 ` Thierry Reding [this message]
2020-03-23 17:21 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200323133456.GG3883508@ulmo \
--to=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=amurray@thegoodpenguin.co.uk \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=vidyas@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).