linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>
To: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
	james.quinlan@broadcom.com
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated list:BROADCOM
	BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE),
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated list:BROADCOM
	BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE),
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: [PATCH v9 09/12] PCI: brcmstb: Set additional internal memory DMA viewport sizes
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 16:33:51 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200724203407.16972-10-james.quinlan@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200724203407.16972-1-james.quinlan@broadcom.com>

The Raspberry Pi (RPI) is currently the only chip using this driver
(pcie-brcmstb.c).  There, only one memory controller is used, without an
extension region, and the SCB0 viewport size is set to the size of the
first and only dma-range region.  Other BrcmSTB SOCs have more complicated
memory configurations that require setting additional viewport sizes.

BrcmSTB PCIe controllers are intimately connected to the memory
controller(s) on the SOC.  The SOC may have one to three memory
controllers; they are indicated by the term SCBi.  Each controller has a
base region and an optional extension region.  In physical memory, the base
and extension regions of a controller are not adjacent, but in PCIe-space
they are.

There is a "viewport" for each memory controller that allows DMA from
endpoint devices.  Each viewport's size must be set to a power of two, and
that size must be equal to or larger than the amount of memory each
controller supports which is the sum of base region and its optional
extension.  Further, the 1-3 viewports are also adjacent in PCIe-space.

Unfortunately the viewport sizes cannot be ascertained from the
"dma-ranges" property so they have their own property, "brcm,scb-sizes".
This is because dma-range information does not indicate what memory
controller it is associated.  For example, consider the following case
where the size of one dma-range is 2GB and the second dma-range is 1GB:

    /* Case 1: SCB0 size set to 4GB */
    dma-range0: 2GB (from memc0-base)
    dma-range1: 1GB (from memc0-extension)

    /* Case 2: SCB0 size set to 2GB, SCB1 size set to 1GB */
    dma-range0: 2GB (from memc0-base)
    dma-range1: 1GB (from memc0-extension)

By just looking at the dma-ranges information, one cannot tell which
situation applies. That is why an additional property is needed.  Its
length indicates the number of memory controllers being used and each value
indicates the viewport size.

Note that the RPI DT does not have a "brcm,scb-sizes" property value,
as it is assumed that it only requires one memory controller and no
extension.  So the optional use of "brcm,scb-sizes" will be backwards
compatible.

One last layer of complexity exists: all of the viewports sizes must be
added and rounded up to a power of two to determine what the "BAR" size is.
Further, an offset must be given that indicates the base PCIe address of
this "BAR".  The use of the term BAR is typically associated with endpoint
devices, and the term is used here because the PCIe HW may be used as an RC
or an EP.  In the former case, all of the system memory appears in a single
"BAR" region in PCIe memory.  As it turns out, BrcmSTB PCIe HW is rarely
used in the EP role and its system of mapping memory is an artifact that
requires multiple dma-ranges regions.

Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>
Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
index 8dacb9d3b7b6..3ef2d37cc43b 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
@@ -57,6 +57,8 @@
 #define  PCIE_MISC_MISC_CTRL_MAX_BURST_SIZE_MASK	0x300000
 #define  PCIE_MISC_MISC_CTRL_MAX_BURST_SIZE_128		0x0
 #define  PCIE_MISC_MISC_CTRL_SCB0_SIZE_MASK		0xf8000000
+#define  PCIE_MISC_MISC_CTRL_SCB1_SIZE_MASK		0x07c00000
+#define  PCIE_MISC_MISC_CTRL_SCB2_SIZE_MASK		0x0000001f
 
 #define PCIE_MISC_CPU_2_PCIE_MEM_WIN0_LO		0x400c
 #define PCIE_MEM_WIN0_LO(win)	\
@@ -154,6 +156,7 @@
 #define SSC_STATUS_OFFSET		0x1
 #define SSC_STATUS_SSC_MASK		0x400
 #define SSC_STATUS_PLL_LOCK_MASK	0x800
+#define PCIE_BRCM_MAX_MEMC		3
 
 #define IDX_ADDR(pcie)			(pcie->reg_offsets[EXT_CFG_INDEX])
 #define DATA_ADDR(pcie)			(pcie->reg_offsets[EXT_CFG_DATA])
@@ -260,6 +263,8 @@ struct brcm_pcie {
 	const int		*reg_field_info;
 	enum pcie_type		type;
 	struct reset_control	*rescal;
+	int			num_memc;
+	u64			memc_size[PCIE_BRCM_MAX_MEMC];
 };
 
 /*
@@ -715,22 +720,44 @@ static inline int brcm_pcie_get_rc_bar2_size_and_offset(struct brcm_pcie *pcie,
 							u64 *rc_bar2_offset)
 {
 	struct pci_host_bridge *bridge = pci_host_bridge_from_priv(pcie);
-	struct device *dev = pcie->dev;
 	struct resource_entry *entry;
+	struct device *dev = pcie->dev;
+	u64 lowest_pcie_addr = ~(u64)0;
+	int ret, i = 0;
+	u64 size = 0;
 
-	entry = resource_list_first_type(&bridge->dma_ranges, IORESOURCE_MEM);
-	if (!entry)
-		return -ENODEV;
+	resource_list_for_each_entry(entry, &bridge->dma_ranges) {
+		u64 pcie_beg = entry->res->start - entry->offset;
 
+		size += entry->res->end - entry->res->start + 1;
+		if (pcie_beg < lowest_pcie_addr)
+			lowest_pcie_addr = pcie_beg;
+	}
 
-	/*
-	 * The controller expects the inbound window offset to be calculated as
-	 * the difference between PCIe's address space and CPU's. The offset
-	 * provided by the firmware is calculated the opposite way, so we
-	 * negate it.
-	 */
-	*rc_bar2_offset = -entry->offset;
-	*rc_bar2_size = 1ULL << fls64(entry->res->end - entry->res->start);
+	if (lowest_pcie_addr == ~(u64)0) {
+		dev_err(dev, "DT node has no dma-ranges\n");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	ret = of_property_read_variable_u64_array(pcie->np, "brcm,scb-sizes", pcie->memc_size, 1,
+						  PCIE_BRCM_MAX_MEMC);
+
+	if (ret <= 0) {
+		/* Make an educated guess */
+		pcie->num_memc = 1;
+		pcie->memc_size[0] = 1 << fls64(size - 1);
+	} else {
+		pcie->num_memc = ret;
+	}
+
+	/* Each memc is viewed through a "port" that is a power of 2 */
+	for (i = 0, size = 0; i < pcie->num_memc; i++)
+		size += pcie->memc_size[i];
+
+	/* System memory starts at this address in PCIe-space */
+	*rc_bar2_offset = lowest_pcie_addr;
+	/* The sum of all memc views must also be a power of 2 */
+	*rc_bar2_size = 1ULL << fls64(size - 1);
 
 	/*
 	 * We validate the inbound memory view even though we should trust
@@ -782,12 +809,11 @@ static int brcm_pcie_setup(struct brcm_pcie *pcie)
 	void __iomem *base = pcie->base;
 	struct device *dev = pcie->dev;
 	struct resource_entry *entry;
-	unsigned int scb_size_val;
 	bool ssc_good = false;
 	struct resource *res;
 	int num_out_wins = 0;
 	u16 nlw, cls, lnksta;
-	int i, ret;
+	int i, ret, memc;
 	u32 tmp, aspm_support;
 
 	/* Reset the bridge */
@@ -827,11 +853,17 @@ static int brcm_pcie_setup(struct brcm_pcie *pcie)
 	writel(upper_32_bits(rc_bar2_offset),
 	       base + PCIE_MISC_RC_BAR2_CONFIG_HI);
 
-	scb_size_val = rc_bar2_size ?
-		       ilog2(rc_bar2_size) - 15 : 0xf; /* 0xf is 1GB */
 	tmp = readl(base + PCIE_MISC_MISC_CTRL);
-	u32p_replace_bits(&tmp, scb_size_val,
-			  PCIE_MISC_MISC_CTRL_SCB0_SIZE_MASK);
+	for (memc = 0; memc < pcie->num_memc; memc++) {
+		u32 scb_size_val = ilog2(pcie->memc_size[memc]) - 15;
+
+		if (memc == 0)
+			u32p_replace_bits(&tmp, scb_size_val, PCIE_MISC_MISC_CTRL_SCB0_SIZE_MASK);
+		else if (memc == 1)
+			u32p_replace_bits(&tmp, scb_size_val, PCIE_MISC_MISC_CTRL_SCB1_SIZE_MASK);
+		else if (memc == 2)
+			u32p_replace_bits(&tmp, scb_size_val, PCIE_MISC_MISC_CTRL_SCB2_SIZE_MASK);
+	}
 	writel(tmp, base + PCIE_MISC_MISC_CTRL);
 
 	/*
-- 
2.17.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-07-24 20:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-24 20:33 [PATCH v9 00/12] PCI: brcmstb: enable PCIe for STB chips Jim Quinlan
2020-07-24 20:33 ` [PATCH v9 01/12] PCI: brcmstb: PCIE_BRCMSTB depends on ARCH_BRCMSTB Jim Quinlan
2020-07-24 20:33 ` [PATCH v9 02/12] ata: ahci_brcm: Fix use of BCM7216 reset controller Jim Quinlan
2020-07-24 21:02   ` Florian Fainelli
2020-07-25  9:18   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2020-07-27  6:58   ` Philipp Zabel
2020-07-24 20:33 ` [PATCH v9 03/12] dt-bindings: PCI: Add bindings for more Brcmstb chips Jim Quinlan
2020-07-24 20:33 ` [PATCH v9 04/12] PCI: brcmstb: Add bcm7278 register info Jim Quinlan
2020-07-24 20:33 ` [PATCH v9 05/12] PCI: brcmstb: Add suspend and resume pm_ops Jim Quinlan
2020-07-24 20:33 ` [PATCH v9 06/12] PCI: brcmstb: Add bcm7278 PERST# support Jim Quinlan
2020-07-24 20:33 ` [PATCH v9 07/12] PCI: brcmstb: Add control of rescal reset Jim Quinlan
2020-07-24 20:33 ` Jim Quinlan [this message]
2020-08-01 17:39   ` [PATCH v9 09/12] PCI: brcmstb: Set additional internal memory DMA viewport sizes Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-08-03 12:40     ` Jim Quinlan
2020-07-24 20:33 ` [PATCH v9 10/12] PCI: brcmstb: Accommodate MSI for older chips Jim Quinlan
2020-07-24 20:33 ` [PATCH v9 11/12] PCI: brcmstb: Set bus max burst size by chip type Jim Quinlan
2020-07-24 20:33 ` [PATCH v9 12/12] PCI: brcmstb: Add bcm7211, bcm7216, bcm7445, bcm7278 to match list Jim Quinlan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200724203407.16972-10-james.quinlan@broadcom.com \
    --to=james.quinlan@broadcom.com \
    --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=nsaenzjulienne@suse.de \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).