linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: "Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org>,
	"Oliver O'Halloran" <oohall@gmail.com>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	"Joe Perches" <joe@perches.com>,
	"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>,
	"David Sterba" <dsterba@suse.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 06/20] sysfs: Introduce BIN_ATTR_ADMIN_RO and BIN_ATTR_ADMIN_RW
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 20:58:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210416205856.3234481-7-kw@linux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210416205856.3234481-1-kw@linux.com>

A very common use case is to limit read and/or write access to certain
sysfs objects to only root with the expectation that the CAP_SYS_ADMIN
capability is needed to access sensitive data exposed through such sysfs
objects.

The existing macros such as BIN_ATTR_RO and BIN_ATTR_RW are sadly
inadequate given the specific need to limit access only to the root
user, as they offer permissions that are too open e.g., 0444 and 0644,
thus a lot of users of binary attributes with this specific use case,
for example, the PCI "config", "rom" and "vps" sysfs objects, would opt
to use the BIN_ATTR macro directly specifying 0400 or 0600 as needed.

Add a new set of macros with an explicit "ADMIN" identifier catering to
this specific use case that also follows the semantic of other existing
macros such as e.g., BIN_ATTR_RO, BIN_ATTR_RW, BIN_ATTR_WO, etc.

No functional change intended.

Related:
  commit 60d360acddc5 ("driver-core: Introduce DEVICE_ATTR_ADMIN_{RO,RW}")

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@linux.com>
---
 include/linux/sysfs.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/sysfs.h b/include/linux/sysfs.h
index d76a1ddf83a3..9f423dfa8494 100644
--- a/include/linux/sysfs.h
+++ b/include/linux/sysfs.h
@@ -205,6 +205,13 @@ struct bin_attribute {
 	.size	= _size,						\
 }
 
+#define __BIN_ATTR_RO_MODE(_name, _mode, _size) {			\
+	.attr	= { .name = __stringify(_name),				\
+		    .mode = VERIFY_OCTAL_PERMISSIONS(_mode) },		\
+	.read	= _name##_read,						\
+	.size	= _size,						\
+}
+
 #define __BIN_ATTR_WO(_name, _size) {					\
 	.attr	= { .name = __stringify(_name), .mode = 0200 },		\
 	.write	= _name##_write,					\
@@ -214,6 +221,14 @@ struct bin_attribute {
 #define __BIN_ATTR_RW(_name, _size)					\
 	__BIN_ATTR(_name, 0644, _name##_read, _name##_write, _size)
 
+#define __BIN_ATTR_RW_MODE(_name, _mode, _size) {			\
+	.attr	= { .name = __stringify(_name),				\
+		    .mode = VERIFY_OCTAL_PERMISSIONS(_mode) },		\
+	.read	= _name##_read,						\
+	.write	= _name##_write,					\
+	.size	= _size,						\
+}
+
 #define __BIN_ATTR_NULL __ATTR_NULL
 
 #define BIN_ATTR(_name, _mode, _read, _write, _size)			\
@@ -223,12 +238,20 @@ struct bin_attribute bin_attr_##_name = __BIN_ATTR(_name, _mode, _read,	\
 #define BIN_ATTR_RO(_name, _size)					\
 struct bin_attribute bin_attr_##_name = __BIN_ATTR_RO(_name, _size)
 
+#define BIN_ATTR_ADMIN_RO(_name, _size)					\
+struct bin_attribute bin_attr_##_name = __BIN_ATTR_RO_MODE(_name, 0400,	\
+					_size)
+
 #define BIN_ATTR_WO(_name, _size)					\
 struct bin_attribute bin_attr_##_name = __BIN_ATTR_WO(_name, _size)
 
 #define BIN_ATTR_RW(_name, _size)					\
 struct bin_attribute bin_attr_##_name = __BIN_ATTR_RW(_name, _size)
 
+#define BIN_ATTR_ADMIN_RW(_name, _size)					\
+struct bin_attribute bin_attr_##_name = __BIN_ATTR_RW_MODE(_name, 0600,	\
+					_size)
+
 struct sysfs_ops {
 	ssize_t	(*show)(struct kobject *, struct attribute *, char *);
 	ssize_t	(*store)(struct kobject *, struct attribute *, const char *, size_t);
-- 
2.31.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-04-16 20:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-16 20:58 [PATCH 00/20] PCI: Convert dynamic sysfs objects into static Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-04-16 20:58 ` [PATCH 01/20] PCI: Convert dynamic "config" sysfs object " Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-04-16 20:58 ` [PATCH 02/20] PCI: Convert dynamic "rom" " Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-04-16 20:58 ` [PATCH 03/20] PCI: Convert dynamic "reset" " Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-04-16 20:58 ` [PATCH 04/20] PCI/VPD: Convert dynamic "vpd" " Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-04-16 20:58 ` [PATCH 05/20] PCI: Convert dynamic "index" and "label" sysfs objects " Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-04-16 20:58 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński [this message]
2021-04-16 20:58 ` [PATCH 07/20] PCI: Convert PCI sysfs objects to use BIN_ATTR_ADMIN_RW macro Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-04-16 20:58 ` [PATCH 08/20] PCI: Move to kstrtobool() to handle user input Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-04-16 20:58 ` [PATCH 09/20] PCI: Use sysfs_emit() and sysfs_emit_at() in "show" functions Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-04-16 20:58 ` [PATCH 10/20] PCI: Update style to be more consistent Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-04-16 20:58 ` [PATCH 11/20] PCI: Rearrange attributes from the pci_dev_group Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-04-16 20:58 ` [PATCH 12/20] PCI: Rearrange attributes from the pci_dev_config_attr_group Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-04-16 20:58 ` [PATCH 13/20] PCI: Rearrange attributes from the pci_dev_rom_attr_group Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-04-16 20:58 ` [PATCH 14/20] PCI: Rearrange attributes from the pci_dev_reset_attr_group Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-04-16 20:58 ` [PATCH 15/20] PCI: Rearrange attributes from the pci_dev_attr_group Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-04-16 20:58 ` [PATCH 16/20] PCI: Rearrange attributes from the pci_dev_hp_attr_group Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-04-16 20:58 ` [PATCH 17/20] PCI: Rearrange attributes from the pci_bridge_attr_group Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-04-16 20:58 ` [PATCH 18/20] PCI: Rearrange attributes from the pcie_dev_attr_group Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-04-16 20:58 ` [PATCH 19/20] PCI: Rearrange attributes from the pci_bus_group Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-04-16 20:58 ` [PATCH 20/20] PCI: Rearrange attributes from the pcibus_group Krzysztof Wilczyński

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210416205856.3234481-7-kw@linux.com \
    --to=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab+huawei@kernel.org \
    --cc=oohall@gmail.com \
    --cc=pali@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).