linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Sheng Bi <windy.bi.enflame@gmail.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: Fix no-op wait after secondary bus reset
Date: Sat, 21 May 2022 14:49:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220521124910.GA13556@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGdb+H2_pX4TzG=sJ8XE6KiyWW9niJQawCbcDN2byxDfybukiA@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, May 21, 2022 at 04:36:10PM +0800, Sheng Bi wrote:
> If so, I also want to align the polling things mentioned in the
> question from Alex, since pci_dev_wait() is also used for reset
> functions other than SBR. To Bjorn, Alex, Lucas, how do you think if
> we need to change the polling in pci_dev_wait() to 20ms intervals, or
> keep binary exponential back-off with probable unexpected extra
> timeout delay.

The exponential backoff should probably be capped at some point
to avoid excessive wait delays.  I guess the rationale for
exponential backoff is to not poll too frequently.
Capping at 20 msec or 100 msec may be reasonable, i.e.:

-		delay *= 2;
+		delay = min(delay * 2, 100);

Thanks,

Lukas

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-21 12:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-16 17:30 [PATCH] drivers/pci: wait downstream hierarchy ready instead of slot itself ready, after secondary bus reset windy.bi.enflame
2022-05-16 20:28 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-05-16 22:57   ` Alex Williamson
2022-05-17 14:56     ` windy Bi
2022-05-18 11:54     ` [PATCH v2] PCI: Fix no-op wait " Sheng Bi
2022-05-19 17:06       ` Alex Williamson
2022-05-20  3:00         ` windy Bi
2022-05-20  6:41       ` Lukas Wunner
2022-05-21  8:36         ` Sheng Bi
2022-05-21 12:49           ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2022-05-21 17:37             ` Sheng Bi
2022-05-23 14:20               ` Lukas Wunner
2022-05-23 15:59                 ` Sheng Bi
2022-05-23 17:15                   ` [PATCH v3] " Sheng Bi
2022-06-08 13:16                     ` Sheng Bi
2022-06-08 15:23                     ` Lukas Wunner
2022-05-17  5:34 ` [PATCH] drivers/pci: wait downstream hierarchy ready instead of slot itself ready, " kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220521124910.GA13556@wunner.de \
    --to=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=windy.bi.enflame@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).