linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Mikhak <alan.mikhak@sifive.com>
To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
Cc: Gustavo Pimentel <Gustavo.Pimentel@synopsys.com>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	"arnd@arndb.de" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"jingoohan1@gmail.com" <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
	"bhelgaas@google.com" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"wen.yang99@zte.com.cn" <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn>,
	"kjlu@umn.edu" <kjlu@umn.edu>,
	"linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
	"palmer@sifive.com" <palmer@sifive.com>,
	"paul.walmsley@sifive.com" <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: endpoint: Add DMA to Linux PCI EP Framework
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2019 10:42:34 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABEDWGx2N66L=27JY6Ywbfny78UaxENkxBTqxU37PfuQO-ZMZw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6e692ff6-e64f-e651-c8ae-34d0034ad7b9@ti.com>

On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 9:43 PM Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> wrote:
> Hi Alan,
> On 31/05/19 11:46 PM, Alan Mikhak wrote:
> > On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 10:08 PM Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> wrote:
> >> Hi Alan,
> >>> Hi Kishon,
> >>
> >> I still have to look closer into your DMA patch but linked-list mode or single
> >> block mode shouldn't be an user select-able option but should be determined by
> >> the size of transfer.
> >
> > Please consider the following when taking a closer look at this patch.
>
> After seeing comments from Vinod and Arnd, it looks like the better way of
> adding DMA support would be to register DMA within PCI endpoint controller to
> DMA subsystem (as dmaengine) and use only dmaengine APIs in pci_epf_test.

Thanks Kishon. That makes it clear where these pieces should go.

> > In my specific use case, I need to verify that any valid block size,
> > including a one byte transfer, can be transferred across the PCIe bus
> > by memcpy_toio/fromio() or by DMA either as a single block or as
> > linked-list. That is why, instead of deciding based on transfer size,
> > this patch introduces the '-L' flag for pcitest to communicate the
> > user intent across the PCIe bus to pci-epf-test so the endpoint can
> > initiate the DMA transfer using a single block or in linked-list mode.
> The -L option seems to select an internal DMA configuration which might be
> specific to one implementation. As Gustavo already pointed, we should have only
> generic options in pcitest. This would no longer be applicable when we move to
> dmaengine.

Single-block DMA seemed as generic as linked-list DMA and
memcpy_toio/fromio. It remains unclear how else to communicate that
intent to pci_epf_test each time I invoke pcitest.

Regards,
Alan

  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-03 17:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-23 22:24 [PATCH] PCI: endpoint: Add DMA to Linux PCI EP Framework Alan Mikhak
2019-05-24  8:59 ` Gustavo Pimentel
2019-05-24 19:42   ` Alan Mikhak
2019-05-27  9:09     ` Gustavo Pimentel
2019-05-29 22:37       ` Alan Mikhak
2019-05-30  5:46         ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-05-30 17:56           ` Alan Mikhak
2019-05-31  5:06             ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-05-31 18:16               ` Alan Mikhak
2019-06-03  4:41                 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-06-03 17:42                   ` Alan Mikhak [this message]
2019-09-13 12:11                     ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-09-13 17:39                       ` Alan Mikhak
2019-05-31  5:07           ` Vinod Koul
2019-05-31  5:20             ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-05-31  6:32               ` Vinod Koul
2019-05-31  7:49                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-06-03  4:29                   ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-06-03  4:24                 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-06-03  4:42                   ` Vinod Koul

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CABEDWGx2N66L=27JY6Ywbfny78UaxENkxBTqxU37PfuQO-ZMZw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=alan.mikhak@sifive.com \
    --cc=Gustavo.Pimentel@synopsys.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
    --cc=kishon@ti.com \
    --cc=kjlu@umn.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=palmer@sifive.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    --cc=wen.yang99@zte.com.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).