From: "Sean V Kelley" <sean.v.kelley@intel.com>
To: "Jonathan Cameron" <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, tony.luck@intel.com,
"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] Add RCEC handling to PCI/AER
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 07:56:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E04FFB14-95BA-4D04-BC53-037B5EB2FE80@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200727133736.00001066@Huawei.com>
Hi Jonathan,
On 27 Jul 2020, at 5:37, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jul 2020 10:22:14 -0700
> Sean V Kelley <sean.v.kelley@intel.com> wrote:
>
>> Root Complex Event Collectors (RCEC) provide support for terminating
>> error
>> and PME messages from Root Complex Integrated Endpoints (RCiEPs). An
>> RCEC
>> resides on a Bus in the Root Complex. Multiple RCECs can in fact
>> reside on
>> a single bus. An RCEC will explicitly declare supported RCiEPs
>> through the
>> Root Complex Endpoint Association Extended Capability.
>>
>> (See PCIe 5.0-1, sections 1.3.2.3 (RCiEP), and 7.9.10 (RCEC Ext.
>> Cap.))
>>
>> The kernel lacks handling for these RCECs and the error messages
>> received
>> from their respective associated RCiEPs. More recently, a new CPU
>> interconnect, Compute eXpress Link (CXL) depends on RCEC capabilities
>> for
>> purposes of error messaging from CXL 1.1 supported RCiEP devices.
>>
>> DocLink: https://www.computeexpresslink.org/
>>
>> This use case is not limited to CXL. Existing hardware today includes
>> support for RCECs, such as the Denverton microserver product
>> family. Future hardware will be forthcoming.
>>
>> (See Intel Document, Order number: 33061-003US)
>>
>> So services such as AER or PME could be associated with an RCEC
>> driver.
>> In the case of CXL, if an RCiEP (i.e., CXL 1.1 device) is associated
>> with a
>> platform's RCEC it shall signal PME and AER error conditions through
>> that
>> RCEC.
>>
>> Towards the above use cases, add the missing RCEC class and extend
>> the
>> PCIe Root Port and service drivers to allow association of RCiEPs to
>> their
>> respective parent RCEC and facilitate handling of terminating error
>> and PME
>> messages.
>
> Silly question number 1. Why an RFC? I always find it helps to
> highlight which
> bits you are unsure on / want particular input on.
I suppose it was because we were continuing the conversation from
discussion on the mailing list.
And I was not fully sure about the impact to your use case. No worries,
I will remove it.
>
> Otherwise, I've left the PME and error injection patches as I don't
> really know
> anything about those two paths.
>
> I'll fire up my APEI etc test VMs in the nex day or so and report back
> if there
> any problems with that case (fairly sure there is one in patch 6,
> highlighted in
> review but it is possible I've missed others.
>
> It all seems to have come together rather simpler than I was expecting
> which is
> great!
Sounds good, looking forward to your feedback.
Sean
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jonathan
>
>
>>
>> TESTING:
>>
>> Results:
>> 1) Show RCiEPs which are associated with RCECs:
>> Run dmesg | grep "RCiEP"
>> Log:
>> [ 8.981698] pcieport 0000:e8:00.4: RCiEP(under an RCEC)
>> 0000:e8:01.0
>> [ 8.988830] pcieport 0000:e8:00.4: RCiEP(under an RCEC)
>> 0000:e8:02.0
>> [ 8.995956] pcieport 0000:e8:00.4: RCiEP(under an RCEC)
>> 0000:e9:00.0
>> [ 9.023034] pcieport 0000:ed:00.4: RCiEP(under an RCEC)
>> 0000:ed:01.0
>> [ 9.030159] pcieport 0000:ed:00.4: RCiEP(under an RCEC)
>> 0000:ed:02.0
>> [ 9.037282] pcieport 0000:ed:00.4: RCiEP(under an RCEC)
>> 0000:ee:00.0
>> [ 9.064294] pcieport 0000:f2:00.4: RCiEP(under an RCEC)
>> 0000:f2:01.0
>> [ 9.071409] pcieport 0000:f2:00.4: RCiEP(under an RCEC)
>> 0000:f2:02.0
>> [ 9.078526] pcieport 0000:f2:00.4: RCiEP(under an RCEC)
>> 0000:f3:00.0
>> [ 9.105535] pcieport 0000:f7:00.4: RCiEP(under an RCEC)
>> 0000:f7:01.0
>> [ 9.112652] pcieport 0000:f7:00.4: RCiEP(under an RCEC)
>> 0000:f7:02.0
>> [ 9.119774] pcieport 0000:f7:00.4: RCiEP(under an RCEC)
>> 0000:f8:00.0
>>
>> 2) Inject a correctable error to the RCiEP 0000:e9:00.0
>> Run ./aer_inject <a parameter file as below>:
>> AER
>> PCI_ID 0000:e9:00.0
>> COR_STATUS BAD_TLP
>> HEADER_LOG 0 1 2 3
>>
>> Log:
>> [ 253.248362] pcieport 0000:e8:00.4: aer_inject: Injecting errors
>> 00000040/00000000 into device 0000:e9:00.0
>> [ 253.260656] pcieport 0000:e8:00.4: AER: Corrected error received:
>> 0000:e9:00.0
>> [ 253.269919] pci 0000:e9:00.0: AER: PCIe Bus Error:
>> severity=Corrected, type=Data Link Layer, (Receiver ID)
>> [ 253.282549] pci 0000:e9:00.0: AER: device [8086:4940] error
>> status/mask=00000040/00002000
>> [ 253.293937] pci 0000:e9:00.0: AER: [ 6] BadTLP
>>
>> 3) Inject a non-fatal error to the RCiEP 0000:e8:01.0
>> Run ./aer_inject <a parameter file as below>:
>> AER
>> PCI_ID 0000:e8:01.0
>> UNCOR_STATUS COMP_ABORT
>> HEADER_LOG 0 1 2 3
>>
>> Log:
>> [ 288.405326] pcieport 0000:e8:00.4: aer_inject: Injecting errors
>> 00000000/00008000 into device 0000:e8:01.0
>> [ 288.416881] pcieport 0000:e8:00.4: AER: Uncorrected (Non-Fatal)
>> error received: 0000:e8:01.0
>> [ 288.427487] igen6_edac 0000:e8:01.0: AER: PCIe Bus Error:
>> severity=Uncorrected (Non-Fatal), type=Transaction Layer, (Completer
>> ID)
>> [ 288.442098] igen6_edac 0000:e8:01.0: AER: device [8086:0b25]
>> error status/mask=00008000/00100000
>> [ 288.452869] igen6_edac 0000:e8:01.0: AER: [15] CmpltAbrt
>> [ 288.461118] igen6_edac 0000:e8:01.0: AER: TLP Header: 00000000
>> 00000001 00000002 00000003
>> [ 288.471192] igen6_edac 0000:e8:01.0: AER: device recovery
>> successful
>>
>> 4) Inject a fatal error to the RCiEP 0000:ed:01.0
>> Run ./aer_inject <a parameter file as below>:
>> AER
>> PCI_ID 0000:ed:01.0
>> UNCOR_STATUS MALF_TLP
>> HEADER_LOG 0 1 2 3
>>
>> Log:
>> [ 535.537281] pcieport 0000:ed:00.4: aer_inject: Injecting errors
>> 00000000/00040000 into device 0000:ed:01.0
>> [ 535.551911] pcieport 0000:ed:00.4: AER: Uncorrected (Fatal) error
>> received: 0000:ed:01.0
>> [ 535.561556] igen6_edac 0000:ed:01.0: AER: PCIe Bus Error:
>> severity=Uncorrected (Fatal), type=Inaccessible, (Unregistered Agent
>> ID)
>> [ 535.684964] igen6_edac 0000:ed:01.0: AER: device recovery
>> successful
>>
>>
>> Jonathan Cameron (1):
>> PCI/AER: Extend AER error handling to RCECs
>>
>> Qiuxu Zhuo (6):
>> pci_ids: Add class code and extended capability for RCEC
>> PCI: Extend Root Port Driver to support RCEC
>> PCI/portdrv: Add pcie_walk_rcec() to walk RCiEPs associated with
>> RCEC
>> PCI/AER: Apply function level reset to RCiEP on fatal error
>> PCI: Add 'rcec' field to pci_dev for associated RCiEPs
>> PCI/AER: Add RCEC AER error injection support
>>
>> Sean V Kelley (2):
>> PCI/AER: Add RCEC AER handling
>> PCI/PME: Add RCEC PME handling
>>
>> drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c | 43 ++++++++++++-----
>> drivers/pci/pcie/aer_inject.c | 5 +-
>> drivers/pci/pcie/err.c | 85
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>> drivers/pci/pcie/pme.c | 15 ++++--
>> drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv.h | 2 +
>> drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c | 20 +++++++-
>> include/linux/pci.h | 3 ++
>> include/linux/pci_ids.h | 1 +
>> include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h | 7 +++
>> 10 files changed, 232 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 2.27.0
>>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-27 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-24 17:22 [RFC PATCH 0/9] Add RCEC handling to PCI/AER Sean V Kelley
2020-07-24 17:22 ` [RFC PATCH 1/9] pci_ids: Add class code and extended capability for RCEC Sean V Kelley
2020-07-27 10:00 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-27 10:21 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-27 15:22 ` Sean V Kelley
2020-07-24 17:22 ` [RFC PATCH 2/9] PCI: Extend Root Port Driver to support RCEC Sean V Kelley
2020-07-27 12:30 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-27 15:05 ` Sean V Kelley
2020-07-24 17:22 ` [RFC PATCH 3/9] PCI/portdrv: Add pcie_walk_rcec() to walk RCiEPs associated with RCEC Sean V Kelley
2020-07-27 10:49 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-27 15:21 ` Sean V Kelley
2020-07-24 17:22 ` [RFC PATCH 4/9] PCI/AER: Extend AER error handling to RCECs Sean V Kelley
2020-07-27 11:00 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-27 14:58 ` Sean V Kelley
2020-07-27 14:04 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-27 15:00 ` Sean V Kelley
2020-07-24 17:22 ` [RFC PATCH 5/9] PCI/AER: Apply function level reset to RCiEP on fatal error Sean V Kelley
2020-07-27 11:17 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-28 13:27 ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2020-07-28 16:14 ` Sean V Kelley
2020-07-28 17:02 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-28 17:42 ` Sean V Kelley
2020-07-24 17:22 ` [RFC PATCH 6/9] PCI: Add 'rcec' field to pci_dev for associated RCiEPs Sean V Kelley
2020-07-27 11:23 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-27 15:39 ` Sean V Kelley
2020-07-27 16:11 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-27 16:28 ` Sean V Kelley
2020-07-24 17:22 ` [RFC PATCH 7/9] PCI/AER: Add RCEC AER handling Sean V Kelley
2020-07-27 12:22 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-27 15:19 ` Sean V Kelley
2020-07-27 17:14 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-24 17:22 ` [RFC PATCH 8/9] PCI/PME: Add RCEC PME handling Sean V Kelley
2020-08-04 8:35 ` Jay Fang
2020-08-04 9:47 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-24 17:22 ` [RFC PATCH 9/9] PCI/AER: Add RCEC AER error injection support Sean V Kelley
2020-07-27 12:37 ` [RFC PATCH 0/9] Add RCEC handling to PCI/AER Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-27 14:56 ` Sean V Kelley [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E04FFB14-95BA-4D04-BC53-037B5EB2FE80@intel.com \
--to=sean.v.kelley@intel.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).