linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
To: <will@kernel.org>, <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
	<leo.yan@linaro.org>, <peterz@infradead.org>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
	<acme@kernel.org>, <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	<alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>, <jolsa@redhat.com>,
	<namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: <irogers@google.com>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
	<zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com>, <liuqi115@huawei.com>,
	John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] perf test: Verify more event members in pmu-events test
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 20:34:23 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1631795665-240946-4-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1631795665-240946-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com>

Function compare_pmu_events() does not compare all struct pmu-events
members, so add tests for missing members "name", "event", "aggr_mod",
"event", "metric_constraint", and "metric_group", and re-order the tests
to match current struct pmu-events member ordering.

Also fix uncore_hisi_l3c_rd_hit_cpipe.event member, now that we're actually
testing it.

Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
---
 tools/perf/tests/pmu-events.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/pmu-events.c b/tools/perf/tests/pmu-events.c
index 8c5a6ba1cb14..adfc17f51c7b 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/pmu-events.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/pmu-events.c
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ static const struct perf_pmu_test_event unc_cbo_xsnp_response_miss_eviction = {
 static const struct perf_pmu_test_event uncore_hisi_l3c_rd_hit_cpipe = {
 	.event = {
 		.name = "uncore_hisi_l3c.rd_hit_cpipe",
-		.event = "event=0x2",
+		.event = "event=0x7",
 		.desc = "Total read hits. Unit: hisi_sccl,l3c ",
 		.topic = "uncore",
 		.long_desc = "Total read hits",
@@ -255,6 +255,24 @@ static struct pmu_event *__test_pmu_get_sys_events_table(void)
 
 static int compare_pmu_events(struct pmu_event *e1, const struct pmu_event *e2)
 {
+	if (!is_same(e1->name, e2->name)) {
+		pr_debug2("testing event e1 %s: mismatched name string, %s vs %s\n",
+			  e1->name, e1->name, e2->name);
+		return -1;
+	}
+
+	if (!is_same(e1->compat, e2->compat)) {
+		pr_debug2("testing event e1 %s: mismatched compat string, %s vs %s\n",
+			  e1->name, e1->compat, e2->compat);
+		return -1;
+	}
+
+	if (!is_same(e1->event, e2->event)) {
+		pr_debug2("testing event e1 %s: mismatched event, %s vs %s\n",
+			  e1->name, e1->event, e2->event);
+		return -1;
+	}
+
 	if (!is_same(e1->desc, e2->desc)) {
 		pr_debug2("testing event e1 %s: mismatched desc, %s vs %s\n",
 			  e1->name, e1->desc, e2->desc);
@@ -273,6 +291,12 @@ static int compare_pmu_events(struct pmu_event *e1, const struct pmu_event *e2)
 		return -1;
 	}
 
+	if (!is_same(e1->pmu, e2->pmu)) {
+		pr_debug2("testing event e1 %s: mismatched pmu string, %s vs %s\n",
+			  e1->name, e1->pmu, e2->pmu);
+		return -1;
+	}
+
 	if (!is_same(e1->unit, e2->unit)) {
 		pr_debug2("testing event e1 %s: mismatched unit, %s vs %s\n",
 			  e1->name, e1->unit, e2->unit);
@@ -285,6 +309,12 @@ static int compare_pmu_events(struct pmu_event *e1, const struct pmu_event *e2)
 		return -1;
 	}
 
+	if (!is_same(e1->aggr_mode, e2->aggr_mode)) {
+		pr_debug2("testing event e1 %s: mismatched aggr_mode, %s vs %s\n",
+			  e1->name, e1->aggr_mode, e2->aggr_mode);
+		return -1;
+	}
+
 	if (!is_same(e1->metric_expr, e2->metric_expr)) {
 		pr_debug2("testing event e1 %s: mismatched metric_expr, %s vs %s\n",
 			  e1->name, e1->metric_expr, e2->metric_expr);
@@ -297,21 +327,21 @@ static int compare_pmu_events(struct pmu_event *e1, const struct pmu_event *e2)
 		return -1;
 	}
 
-	if (!is_same(e1->deprecated, e2->deprecated)) {
-		pr_debug2("testing event e1 %s: mismatched deprecated, %s vs %s\n",
-			  e1->name, e1->deprecated, e2->deprecated);
+	if (!is_same(e1->metric_group, e2->metric_group)) {
+		pr_debug2("testing event e1 %s: mismatched metric_group, %s vs %s\n",
+			  e1->name, e1->metric_group, e2->metric_group);
 		return -1;
 	}
 
-	if (!is_same(e1->pmu, e2->pmu)) {
-		pr_debug2("testing event e1 %s: mismatched pmu string, %s vs %s\n",
-			  e1->name, e1->pmu, e2->pmu);
+	if (!is_same(e1->deprecated, e2->deprecated)) {
+		pr_debug2("testing event e1 %s: mismatched deprecated, %s vs %s\n",
+			  e1->name, e1->deprecated, e2->deprecated);
 		return -1;
 	}
 
-	if (!is_same(e1->compat, e2->compat)) {
-		pr_debug2("testing event e1 %s: mismatched compat string, %s vs %s\n",
-			  e1->name, e1->compat, e2->compat);
+	if (!is_same(e1->metric_constraint, e2->metric_constraint)) {
+		pr_debug2("testing event e1 %s: mismatched metric_constant, %s vs %s\n",
+			  e1->name, e1->metric_constraint, e2->metric_constraint);
 		return -1;
 	}
 
-- 
2.26.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-09-16 12:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-16 12:34 [PATCH 0/5] Improve perf list support for hisi uncore PMUs John Garry
2021-09-16 12:34 ` [PATCH 1/5] perf parse-events: Set numeric term config John Garry
2021-09-28 17:59   ` Ian Rogers
2021-09-28 19:16     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-09-16 12:34 ` [PATCH 2/5] perf jevents: Support ConfigCode John Garry
2021-09-28 18:00   ` Ian Rogers
2021-09-16 12:34 ` John Garry [this message]
2021-09-28 18:02   ` [PATCH 3/5] perf test: Verify more event members in pmu-events test Ian Rogers
2021-09-16 12:34 ` [PATCH 4/5] perf test: Add pmu-event test for event described as "config=" John Garry
2021-09-28 18:03   ` Ian Rogers
2021-09-16 12:34 ` [PATCH 5/5] perf vendor events arm64: Revise hip08 uncore events John Garry
2021-09-28 18:04   ` Ian Rogers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1631795665-240946-4-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com \
    --to=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=liuqi115@huawei.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).