On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 10:40:11AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 3 December 2014 at 05:06, Eduardo Valentin wrote: > >> - ret = get_property(cpufreq_device, state, &clip_freq, GET_FREQ); > >> - if (ret) > >> - return ret; > >> - > >> + clip_freq = cpufreq_device->freq_table[state]; > > > > There should be some check for valid state here.. > > What about this ?? Sounds good to me. > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c > index 6bd95bc..6e76417 100644 > --- a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c > +++ b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c > @@ -228,6 +228,10 @@ static int cpufreq_set_cur_state(struct > thermal_cooling_device *cdev, > unsigned int cpu = cpumask_any(&cpufreq_device->allowed_cpus); > unsigned int clip_freq; > > + /* Request state should be less than max_level */ > + if (WARN_ON(state > cpufreq_device->max_level)) > + return -EINVAL; > + > /* Check if the old cooling action is same as new cooling action */ > if (cpufreq_device->cpufreq_state == state) > return 0;