From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, edubezval@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@gmail.com>,
Javi Merino <javi.merino@kernel.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>, Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>,
"open list:CPU FREQUENCY DRIVERS - ARM BIG LITTLE"
<linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"open list:TI BANDGAP AND THERMAL DRIVER"
<linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/3] thermal/drivers/cpu_cooling: Unregister with the policy
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 08:28:31 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190626025831.jmyzyypxr6ezpbtu@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190625113244.18146-2-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
On 25-06-19, 13:32, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index aee024e42618..f07454249fbc 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -1379,8 +1379,8 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
> cpufreq_driver->ready(policy);
>
> if (cpufreq_thermal_control_enabled(cpufreq_driver))
> - policy->cdev = of_cpufreq_cooling_register(policy);
> -
> + of_cpufreq_cooling_register(policy);
> +
We don't need any error checking here anymore ?
> pr_debug("initialization complete\n");
>
> return 0;
> @@ -1468,10 +1468,8 @@ static int cpufreq_offline(unsigned int cpu)
> goto unlock;
> }
>
> - if (cpufreq_thermal_control_enabled(cpufreq_driver)) {
> - cpufreq_cooling_unregister(policy->cdev);
> - policy->cdev = NULL;
> - }
> + if (cpufreq_thermal_control_enabled(cpufreq_driver))
> + cpufreq_cooling_unregister(policy);
And we unregister unconditionally, even if we failed ? What if this
routine prints error messages for such an case ?
>
> if (cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu)
> cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu(policy);
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c
> index 83486775e593..007c7c6bf845 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c
> @@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ struct cpufreq_cooling_device {
> struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
> struct list_head node;
> struct time_in_idle *idle_time;
> + struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev;
> };
>
> static DEFINE_IDA(cpufreq_ida);
> @@ -606,6 +607,7 @@ __cpufreq_cooling_register(struct device_node *np,
> goto remove_ida;
>
> cpufreq_cdev->clipped_freq = get_state_freq(cpufreq_cdev, 0);
> + cpufreq_cdev->cdev = cdev;
>
> mutex_lock(&cooling_list_lock);
> /* Register the notifier for first cpufreq cooling device */
> @@ -699,18 +701,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_cpufreq_cooling_register);
> *
> * This interface function unregisters the "thermal-cpufreq-%x" cooling device.
> */
> -void cpufreq_cooling_unregister(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev)
> +void cpufreq_cooling_unregister(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> {
> struct cpufreq_cooling_device *cpufreq_cdev;
> bool last;
>
> - if (!cdev)
> - return;
> -
> - cpufreq_cdev = cdev->devdata;
> -
> mutex_lock(&cooling_list_lock);
> - list_del(&cpufreq_cdev->node);
> + list_for_each_entry(cpufreq_cdev, &cpufreq_cdev_list, node) {
> + if (cpufreq_cdev->policy == policy) {
> + list_del(&cpufreq_cdev->node);
> + break;
> + }
> + }
What if we reach here without a match for the policy ? We shouldn't
continue and error out, right ? Print an error message as well ?
--
viresh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-26 2:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-25 11:32 [PATCH V3 1/3] cpufreq: Move the IS_ENABLED(CPU_THERMAL) macro in a stub Daniel Lezcano
2019-06-25 11:32 ` [PATCH V3 2/3] thermal/drivers/cpu_cooling: Unregister with the policy Daniel Lezcano
2019-06-26 2:58 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2019-06-26 6:02 ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-06-26 6:37 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-06-26 9:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-06-26 10:19 ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-06-26 11:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-06-26 12:52 ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-06-25 11:32 ` [PATCH V3 3/3] thermal/drivers/cpu_cooling: cpufreq_cooling_register returns an int Daniel Lezcano
2019-06-26 2:59 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190626025831.jmyzyypxr6ezpbtu@vireshk-i7 \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=amit.kachhap@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=edubezval@gmail.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=j-keerthy@ti.com \
--cc=javi.merino@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).