linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
To: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@nxp.com>
Cc: "MyungJoo Ham" <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>,
	"Kyungmin Park" <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
	"Chanwoo Choi" <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
	"Artur Świgoń" <a.swigon@partner.samsung.com>,
	"Saravana Kannan" <saravanak@google.com>,
	"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk@kernel.org>,
	"Alexandre Bailon" <abailon@baylibre.com>,
	"Georgi Djakov" <georgi.djakov@linaro.org>,
	"Abel Vesa" <abel.vesa@nxp.com>, "Jacky Bai" <ping.bai@nxp.com>,
	"Viresh Kumar" <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] PM / devfreq: Move more initialization before registration
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 16:29:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190918232904.GP133864@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <59bd0d871fad520eb417ca46943fa7f86ef9186a.1568764439.git.leonard.crestez@nxp.com>

Hi Leonard,

On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 03:18:22AM +0300, Leonard Crestez wrote:
> In general it is a better to initialize an object before making it
> accessible externally (through device_register).
> 
> This make it possible to avoid relying on locking a partially
> initialized object.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@nxp.com>
> ---
>  drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
> index a715f27f35fd..57a217fc92de 100644
> --- a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
> @@ -589,10 +589,12 @@ static void devfreq_dev_release(struct device *dev)
>  
>  	if (devfreq->profile->exit)
>  		devfreq->profile->exit(devfreq->dev.parent);
>  
>  	mutex_destroy(&devfreq->lock);
> +	kfree(devfreq->time_in_state);
> +	kfree(devfreq->trans_table);
>  	kfree(devfreq);
>  }
>  
>  /**
>   * devfreq_add_device() - Add devfreq feature to the device
> @@ -671,44 +673,43 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev,
>  	devfreq->max_freq = devfreq->scaling_max_freq;
>  
>  	devfreq->suspend_freq = dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp_freq(dev);
>  	atomic_set(&devfreq->suspend_count, 0);
>  
> -	dev_set_name(&devfreq->dev, "devfreq%d",
> -				atomic_inc_return(&devfreq_no));
> -	err = device_register(&devfreq->dev);
> -	if (err) {
> -		mutex_unlock(&devfreq->lock);
> -		put_device(&devfreq->dev);
> -		goto err_out;
> -	}
> -
> -	devfreq->trans_table = devm_kzalloc(&devfreq->dev,
> +	devfreq->trans_table = kzalloc(
>  			array3_size(sizeof(unsigned int),
>  				    devfreq->profile->max_state,
>  				    devfreq->profile->max_state),
>  			GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!devfreq->trans_table) {
>  		mutex_unlock(&devfreq->lock);
>  		err = -ENOMEM;
> -		goto err_devfreq;
> +		goto err_dev;
>  	}
>  
> -	devfreq->time_in_state = devm_kcalloc(&devfreq->dev,
> -			devfreq->profile->max_state,
> -			sizeof(unsigned long),
> -			GFP_KERNEL);
> +	devfreq->time_in_state = kcalloc(devfreq->profile->max_state,
> +					 sizeof(unsigned long),
> +					 GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!devfreq->time_in_state) {
>  		mutex_unlock(&devfreq->lock);
>  		err = -ENOMEM;
> -		goto err_devfreq;
> +		goto err_dev;
>  	}
>  
>  	devfreq->last_stat_updated = jiffies;
>  
>  	srcu_init_notifier_head(&devfreq->transition_notifier_list);
>  
> +	dev_set_name(&devfreq->dev, "devfreq%d",
> +				atomic_inc_return(&devfreq_no));
> +	err = device_register(&devfreq->dev);
> +	if (err) {
> +		mutex_unlock(&devfreq->lock);
> +		put_device(&devfreq->dev);
> +		goto err_out;

  		goto err_dev;

> +	}
> +
>  	mutex_unlock(&devfreq->lock);
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&devfreq_list_lock);
>  
>  	governor = try_then_request_governor(devfreq->governor_name);
> @@ -734,14 +735,15 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev,
>  
>  	return devfreq;
>  
>  err_init:
>  	mutex_unlock(&devfreq_list_lock);
> -err_devfreq:
>  	devfreq_remove_device(devfreq);
> -	devfreq = NULL;
> +	return ERR_PTR(err);

The two return paths in the unwind part are unorthodox, but I
see why they are needed. Maybe add an empty line between the two paths
to make it a bit more evident that they are separate.

>  err_dev:

This code path should include

	mutex_destroy(&devfreq->lock);

That was already missing in the original code though.

Actually with the later device registration the mutex could be
initialized later and doesn't need to be held. This would
obsolete the mutex_unlock() calls in the error paths.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-18 23:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-18  0:18 [PATCH 0/8] PM / devfreq: Add dev_pm_qos support Leonard Crestez
2019-09-18  0:18 ` [PATCH 1/8] PM / devfreq: Lock devfreq in trans_stat_show Leonard Crestez
2019-09-18 21:28   ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-09-19 18:42     ` Leonard Crestez
2019-09-19 19:25       ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-09-18  0:18 ` [PATCH 2/8] PM / devfreq: Don't fail devfreq_dev_release if not in list Leonard Crestez
2019-09-18 21:41   ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-09-18  0:18 ` [PATCH 3/8] PM / devfreq: Move more initialization before registration Leonard Crestez
2019-09-18 23:29   ` Matthias Kaehlcke [this message]
2019-09-19  0:14     ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-09-19 18:52     ` Leonard Crestez
2019-09-19 19:16       ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-09-18  0:18 ` [PATCH 4/8] PM / devfreq: Don't take lock in devfreq_add_device Leonard Crestez
2019-09-19  0:20   ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-09-18  0:18 ` [PATCH 5/8] PM / devfreq: Introduce devfreq_get_freq_range Leonard Crestez
2019-09-19 18:07   ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-09-18  0:18 ` [PATCH 6/8] PM / devfreq: Add dev_pm_qos support Leonard Crestez
2019-09-19 19:12   ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-09-18  0:18 ` [PATCH 7/8] PM / devfreq: Use dev_pm_qos for sysfs min/max_freq Leonard Crestez
2019-09-19 19:59   ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-09-20 13:50     ` Leonard Crestez
2019-09-18  0:18 ` [PATCH 8/8] PM / devfreq: Move opp notifier registration to core Leonard Crestez
2019-09-30 21:49   ` Chanwoo Choi
2019-10-01 15:14     ` Leonard Crestez

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190918232904.GP133864@google.com \
    --to=mka@chromium.org \
    --cc=a.swigon@partner.samsung.com \
    --cc=abailon@baylibre.com \
    --cc=abel.vesa@nxp.com \
    --cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
    --cc=georgi.djakov@linaro.org \
    --cc=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
    --cc=leonard.crestez@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=myungjoo.ham@samsung.com \
    --cc=ping.bai@nxp.com \
    --cc=saravanak@google.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).