linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
	Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: vexpress-spc: Fix wrong alternation of policy->related_cpus during CPU hp
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 12:48:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191127114801.23837-1-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> (raw)

Since commit ca74b316df96 ("arm: Use common cpu_topology structure and
functions.") the core cpumask has to be modified during cpu hotplug
operations.

("arm: Fix topology setup in case of CPU hotplug for CONFIG_SCHED_MC")
[1] fixed that but revealed another issue on TC2, i.e in its cpufreq
driver.

During CPU hp stress operations on multiple CPUs, policy->related_cpus
can be altered. This is wrong since this cpumask should contain the
online and offline CPUs.

The WARN_ON(!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, policy->related_cpus)) in
cpufreq_online() triggers in this case.

The core cpumask can't be used to set the policy->cpus in
ve_spc_cpufreq_init() anymore in case it is called via
cpuhp_cpufreq_online()->cpufreq_online()->cpufreq_driver->init().

An empty online() callback can be used to avoid that the init()
driver function is called during CPU hotplug in so that
policy->related_cpus will not be changed.

Implementing an online() also requires an offline() callback.

Tested on TC2 with CPU hp stress test (CPU hp from multiple CPUs at
the same time).

[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191127103353.12417-1-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com

Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/vexpress-spc-cpufreq.c | 12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/vexpress-spc-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/vexpress-spc-cpufreq.c
index 506e3f2bf53a..857dcb535e97 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/vexpress-spc-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/vexpress-spc-cpufreq.c
@@ -492,6 +492,16 @@ static void ve_spc_cpufreq_ready(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 	cdev[cur_cluster] = of_cpufreq_cooling_register(policy);
 }
 
+static int ve_spc_cpufreq_online(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int ve_spc_cpufreq_offline(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static struct cpufreq_driver ve_spc_cpufreq_driver = {
 	.name			= "vexpress-spc",
 	.flags			= CPUFREQ_STICKY |
@@ -503,6 +513,8 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver ve_spc_cpufreq_driver = {
 	.init			= ve_spc_cpufreq_init,
 	.exit			= ve_spc_cpufreq_exit,
 	.ready			= ve_spc_cpufreq_ready,
+	.online                 = ve_spc_cpufreq_online,
+	.offline                = ve_spc_cpufreq_offline,
 	.attr			= cpufreq_generic_attr,
 };
 
-- 
2.17.1


             reply	other threads:[~2019-11-27 11:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-27 11:48 Dietmar Eggemann [this message]
2019-11-27 12:07 ` [PATCH] cpufreq: vexpress-spc: Fix wrong alternation of policy->related_cpus during CPU hp Viresh Kumar
2019-11-27 12:10   ` Sudeep Holla
2019-11-27 12:08 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-11-27 12:14   ` Viresh Kumar
2019-11-27 13:32     ` Sudeep Holla
2019-11-27 14:58       ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-11-27 15:40         ` Sudeep Holla
2019-11-27 18:45           ` Sudeep Holla
2019-11-28  2:31           ` Viresh Kumar
2019-11-28 10:01             ` Dietmar Eggemann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191127114801.23837-1-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --to=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liviu.dudau@arm.com \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).