linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@linaro.org>,
	Niklas Cassel <nks@flawful.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] opp: Allow dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() to return -EPROBE_DEFER
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:53:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200812105333.GA913@gerhold.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFq9bbMZD7ifF=ipfBD3ayiLuc6RPwW8_RWZBxMGv_WZkw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 11:10:38AM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > I wasn't sure if the changes in drivers/base/power/domain.c
> > should be made in a separate commit, but they need to be made together
> > with the other changes.
> 
> I would suggest to move the changes in drivers/base/power/domain.c
> into a separate patch, still part of the series, but let it preceed
> $subject patch.
> 

OK, will do that in v2 - thank you!

I have another small build fix reported by the kernel test robot,
but will wait with sending that out until Viresh had a chance to give
some feedback on the basic idea. :)

Thanks!
Stephan

  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-12 10:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-27  9:30 [RFC PATCH 1/2] opp: Allow dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() to return -EPROBE_DEFER Stephan Gerhold
2020-07-27  9:30 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: dt: Refactor initialization to handle probe deferral properly Stephan Gerhold
2020-08-12  9:10 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] opp: Allow dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() to return -EPROBE_DEFER Ulf Hansson
2020-08-12 10:53   ` Stephan Gerhold [this message]
2020-08-12 15:01     ` Viresh Kumar
2020-08-12 15:56       ` Stephan Gerhold
2020-08-24  9:11   ` Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200812105333.GA913@gerhold.net \
    --to=stephan@gerhold.net \
    --cc=georgi.djakov@linaro.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=khilman@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nks@flawful.org \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).