linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2][v3] PM / s2idle: Clear _TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG before suspend to idle
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 14:31:31 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55caab9c03a0d6c3c0a1f45294d6c274b73c954b.1592892767.git.yu.c.chen@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1592892767.git.yu.c.chen@intel.com>

Suspend to idle was found to not work on Goldmont CPU recently.
And the issue was triggered due to:

1. On Goldmont the CPU in idle can only be woken up via IPIs,
   not POLLING mode:
   Commit 08e237fa56a1 ("x86/cpu: Add workaround for MONITOR
   instruction erratum on Goldmont based CPUs")
2. When the CPU is entering suspend to idle process, the
   _TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG is kept on, due to cpuidle_enter_s2idle()
   doesn't properly match call_cpuidle().
3. Commit b2a02fc43a1f ("smp: Optimize send_call_function_single_ipi()")
   makes use of _TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG to avoid sending IPIs to
   idle CPUs.
4. As a result, some IPIs related functions might not work
   well during suspend to idle on Goldmont. For example, one
   suspected victim:
   tick_unfreeze() -> timekeeping_resume() -> hrtimers_resume()
   -> clock_was_set() -> on_each_cpu() might wait forever,
   because the IPIs will not be sent to the CPUs which are
   sleeping with _TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG set, and Goldmont CPU
   could not be woken up by only setting _TIF_NEED_RESCHED
   on the monitor address.

Clear the _TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG flag before entering suspend to idle,
and let the driver's enter_s2idle() to decide whether to set
_TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG or not. So that to avoid the scenario described
above and keep the context consistent with before.

Fixes: b2a02fc43a1f ("smp: Optimize send_call_function_single_ipi()")
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
---
v2: According to Peter's review, v1 is racy, if someone already
    set TIF_NEED_RESCHED this patch just clear POLLING and go to sleep.
    Check TIF_NEED_RESCHED before entering suspend to idle and
    adjust the naming to be consistent with call_cpuidle().

v3: According to Rafael, it would be better to do the simplest fix
   first and then do the cleanup on top of it.
---
 drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
index c149d9e20dfd..e092789187c6 100644
--- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
+++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
 #include <linux/mutex.h>
 #include <linux/sched.h>
 #include <linux/sched/clock.h>
+#include <linux/sched/idle.h>
 #include <linux/notifier.h>
 #include <linux/pm_qos.h>
 #include <linux/cpu.h>
@@ -186,7 +187,7 @@ int cpuidle_enter_s2idle(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, struct cpuidle_device *dev)
 	 * be frozen safely.
 	 */
 	index = find_deepest_state(drv, dev, U64_MAX, 0, true);
-	if (index > 0)
+	if (index > 0 && !current_clr_polling_and_test())
 		enter_s2idle_proper(drv, dev, index);
 
 	return index;
-- 
2.17.1


  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-23  6:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-23  6:31 [PATCH 0/2][v3] Fix IPI missing issue when woken from suspend to idle Chen Yu
2020-06-23  6:31 ` Chen Yu [this message]
2020-06-23 15:13   ` [PATCH 1/2][v3] PM / s2idle: Clear _TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG before " Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-23  6:31 ` [PATCH 2/2][v3] PM / s2idle: Code cleanup to make s2idle consistent with normal idle path Chen Yu
2020-06-23 17:57   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-25  5:15     ` Chen Yu
2020-06-25 10:49       ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55caab9c03a0d6c3c0a1f45294d6c274b73c954b.1592892767.git.yu.c.chen@intel.com \
    --to=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).