From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
"Sasha Levin" <sashal@kernel.org>,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.4 01/12] pwm: spear: Don't modify HW state in .remove callback
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2021 19:52:51 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210710235302.3222809-1-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
[ Upstream commit b601a18f12383001e7a8da238de7ca1559ebc450 ]
A consumer is expected to disable a PWM before calling pwm_put(). And if
they didn't there is hopefully a good reason (or the consumer needs
fixing). Also if disabling an enabled PWM was the right thing to do,
this should better be done in the framework instead of in each low level
driver.
So drop the hardware modification from the .remove() callback.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
drivers/pwm/pwm-spear.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-spear.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-spear.c
index 6c6b44fd3f43..2d11ac277de8 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-spear.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-spear.c
@@ -231,10 +231,6 @@ static int spear_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
static int spear_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct spear_pwm_chip *pc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
- int i;
-
- for (i = 0; i < NUM_PWM; i++)
- pwm_disable(&pc->chip.pwms[i]);
/* clk was prepared in probe, hence unprepare it here */
clk_unprepare(pc->clk);
--
2.30.2
reply other threads:[~2021-07-10 23:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210710235302.3222809-1-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).