Hello Thierry,

On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 04:07:14PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 02:36:39PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > Hello Thierry,
> > 
> > On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 10:27:50AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > Geert Uytterhoeven found a regression in one of my patches. The same
> > > problem exists in several further commits. The respective drivers are
> > > fixed in this series.
> > > 
> > > The affected commits for the first patch is already in v5.4, so this
> > > patch should maybe backported to stable.
> > > The others are in Thierry's for-next branch only.
> > 
> > These four broken patches were now included in your pull request to
> > Linus for v5.14-rc1 but these fixes were not. I wonder that the
> > regression Geert reported made you back out the offending commit but you
> > didn't care for the four identical problems in pwm-spear, pwm-tiecap,
> > pwm-berlin and pwm-ep93xx. Did you miss this series?
> 
> Ugh... this is a nice big mess now. In retrospect I should've just
> backed out all those patches. Or rather not have applied them in the
> first place until they got a Tested-by.
> 
> I'll pull in this series and will send this as a follow-up pull request.

I saw you applied the series to your for-next branch, so next is fixed
since next-20210709. I wonder what makes you wait sending these to
Linus.

The facts are:

 - Fixes were sent to the list on 2021-07-01
 - next was broken since at least next-20210701 up to next-20210708
 - linus/master is broken since v5.14-rc1~42 (2021-07-08) for ep93xx,
   berlin, tiecap, spear and since v5.4-rc1~27 (2019-09-27) for sprd

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |